Addressing risk of financial toxicity in an ambulatory oncology practice: Our institutional experience with the ASCO Quality Training Program.

Authors

null

Thomas A. Hensing

NorthShore University Health System/University of Chicago, Evanston, IL

Thomas A. Hensing, Tyler Bauer, Anna Palafox, Margaret Whalen, George W. Carro

Organizations

NorthShore University Health System/University of Chicago, Evanston, IL, NorthShore University HealthSystem Kellogg Cancer Center, Evanston, IL, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, Kellogg Cancer Care Center, Niles, IL

Research Funding

Other

Background: Due to escalating cost of cancer care, patients (PTs) with cancer are at increased risk for financial toxicity (FTOX) that can exacerbate disparities in care and lead to clinically relevant adverse PT outcomes; including quality of life; symptom burden; adherence; and survival. A review of our informed consent (IC) process demonstrated that PTs were not routinely informed of financial risks of high-cost (HC) cancer therapies at the time of IC. Methods: A multidisciplinary team was formed to conduct a rapid-cycle quality improvement project with the aim of reducing FTOX through improvement in patient education at the time of IC. Because of HC and increased utilization, the initial pilot focused on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). A cause and effect diagram identified the potential causes that FTOX was not addressed during the IC process. Diagnostic data were obtained through staff surveys and querying our EMR from June to August, 2016. A Pareto chart identified lack of educational (ED) tools at the time of IC and a poorly understood prior authorization (PA) process as the most common causes for not addressing risk of FTOX during IC. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) #1 began with development of a PT ED tool to be used during IC. The tool was approved by the Patient Advisory Board. Staff from clinical teams utilizing ICI for approved indication completed training on its use and a pilot study was initiated. PDSA#2 focused on optimizing the PA process and PDSA#3 focused on PT distress and FTOX monitoring through the NCCN distress and a validated patient-reported-outcome tools (COST), respectively. Results: The utilization of the PT ED tool reached the project aim (administer to > 65% of pts during IC) during initial phase of PDSA#1, although accrual is ongoing. A revised PA process (PDSA#2) was developed, staff were educated and the updated PA process was initiated. Work on PDSA#3 is ongoing. Conclusions: This QI project suggests that it is feasible to address FTOX through PT ED during IC for HC cancer therapies. However, the impact of this intervention on PT distress, overall FTOX and treatment disparities will need to be monitored closely.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality; Practice of Quality

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality,Practice of Quality

Sub Track

Learning from Projects Done in a Health System

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 8S; abstract 114)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.8_suppl.114

Abstract #

114

Poster Bd #

E5

Abstract Disclosures