The use of real-world data to examine comparative effectiveness research (CER) and treatment patterns in HER2-negative and triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A systematic literature review.

Authors

null

Monika Parisi

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ

Monika Parisi, Corey Pelletier, Dasha Cherepanov, Michael S Broder, Nadia Noormohamed

Organizations

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: With the accumulation of RWD in healthcare, CER continues to expand. RWD are becoming increasingly relevant in oncology, particularly since the onset of care pathways and CMS’ Oncology Care Model pilot program; yet, CER in oncology presents several challenges as disease biology differs by cancer type and many RWD sources do not capture clinical response, progression or survival. This review examined common endpoints reported in RWD studies on CER and TxP in MBC, focusing on HER2-negative and Triple Negative (TN) MBC. Methods: PubMed (2006-January 2016) and 4 conferences (2011-January 2016)—ASCO and SABC meetings/symposiums—were searched using MeSH/keywords, e.g., metastatic breast cancer, treatment, and comparative effectiveness. RWD CER and TxP studies in U.S. patients with HER2-negative or TNMBC were included; clinical trials were excluded. Results: Of1,782 total records, 17 articles and 9 conference abstracts were included. Studies using RWD increased over time with 2 studies published in 2010, 1 in 2012, 6 in 2013, 6 in 2014, 10 in 2015, and 1 as of January 2016. Of these, 8 were CER and 18 examined TxP. Most studies were retrospective chart reviews (7 CER; 10 TxP studies), others were retrospective secondary database analyses (1 CER; 6 TxP) and physician surveys (2 TxP). RWD sources included commercial insurance claims, SEER-Medicare, and California Cancer Registry data. Nineteen studies reported results in patients with HER2-negative MBC and 7 reported in TNMBC patients. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment duration (TD). CER studies most commonly reported TD and survival outcomes (e.g., OS, PFS), each reported in 75% of the studies. TxP studies also most commonly examined survival outcomes (61% of studies), in addition to various treatment patterns and duration outcomes. Conclusions: This literature review indicates that in parallel to the availability of RWD, published CER studies and analysis of treatment patterns have grown in the last 5 years. The most commonly reported outcomes include OS, TD and PFS.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Safety and Science of Quality

Track

Patient Safety,Science of Quality

Sub Track

Quality Measurement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 8S; abstract 210)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.8_suppl.210

Abstract #

210

Poster Bd #

D15

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Yi Xu

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Real-world PARPi treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer.

First Author: Shaheenah S. Dawood