The SUNPAZ study: Results of an open label, single arm trial to evaluate patients with mRCC treated with everolimus after failure of first line therapy with sunitinib or pazopanib.

Authors

Martin Schostak

Martin Schostak

University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

Martin Schostak , Arnd Nusch , Patrick de Geeter , Thomas Decker , Anna Resch , Claudia Weiss , Stephan H. Schmitz

Organizations

University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, Praxis hamatologie und internistische Onkologie, Ratingen, Germany, Hospital Kassel, Urological Clinical, Kassel, Germany, Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, Praxis Fur Hematology/Oncology, Koeln, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The VEGFR-TKIs Sunitinib and Pazopanib are the currently recommended 1st line agents for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Everolimus is a well-established treatment option after failure of a prior VEGFR-TKI. However, few prospective clinical data exist on the efficacy and safety of Everolimus after failure of a single line of VEGFR-TKI therapy and no clinical data exists on the efficacy and safety of Everolimus following Pazopanib treatment. Methods: This phase IV clinical trial investigated Everolimus 10 mg daily in patients who have progressed on or after 1st line treatment with Sunitinib or Pazopanib. Adult patients with advanced clear cell RCC and an ECOG 0-1 were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients progression-free after 6 months of treatment. Results: 16 and 13 patients who received prior Sunitinib and Pazopanib, respectively, have been enrolled at 13 German sites. The median age was 65 years in the Sunitinib (SUN) group and 74 years in the Pazopanib (PAZ) group. After 6 months of Everolimus treatment, 11/12 (92%) patients in the SUN group showed disease progression, whereas 6/13 (46%) patients in the PAZ group remained progression-free (FAS population). The median OS was 14.8 months in the SUN group (95% CI 9.4 – not reached (NR)) and 20.4 months in the PAZ group (95% CI 11.7 – NR). The most common adverse events (AE) regardless of any relation to study drug included anemia (31.1% (SUN group) vs. 53.8% (PAZ group)), nausea (25.0 vs. 46.2%), stomatitis (12.5 vs. 61.5%), peripheral edema (12.5 vs. 53.8%), and dyspnea (12.5 vs. 46.2%). Conclusions: Patients in the PAZ group showed a lower rate of tumor progression within 6 months and a longer PFS as compared to the SUN group. The results confirm Everolimus as an effective 2nd line treatment option with a favorable safety profile, especially following Pazopanib, and the sequence Pazopanib - Everolimus as effective treatment option for mRCC patients. However, due to the small number of patients enrolled in the study, results have to be interpreted with caution. The types of observed AE are consistent with the well-known toxicity profile of Everolimus. Clinical trial information: NCT01514448

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers; Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01514448

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 6S; abstract 473)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.473

Abstract #

473

Poster Bd #

E12

Abstract Disclosures