Sunitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy followed by sorefenib and sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cell histology: A multicenter randomized trial, CROSS-J-RCC.

Authors

null

Yoshihiko Tomita

Department of Urology, Department of Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan

Yoshihiko Tomita , Sei Naito , Naoto Sassa , Atsushi Takahashi , Tsunenori Kondo , Takuya Koie , Wataru Obara , Yasuyuki Kobayashi , Jun Teishima , Masayuki Takahashi , Hideyasu Matsuyama , Takeshi Ueda , Kenya Yamaguchi , Takeshi Kishida , Ryoichi Shiroki , Takashi Saika , Nobuo Shinohara , Mototsugu Oya , Hiroomi Kanayama

Organizations

Department of Urology, Department of Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Department of Urology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan, Departmentof Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, Department of Urology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan, Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan, Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan, Department of Urology Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima, Japan, Department of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan, Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan, Prostate Center and Division of Urology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan, Department of Urology Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoaki, Japan, Deparment of Urology, Hiroshima City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: SWITCH, a prospective, randomized sequential trial to evaluate SU/SO versus SO/SU, revealed no difference in first-line or total PFS or OS, but no direct comparison was obtained between 1st line sunitinib (SU) and sorafenib (SO) for clear cell (CC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with CC mRCC, ECOG PS 0/1 and MSKCC favorable or intermediate risk were randomized to receive open-label SU/SO or SO/SU at the standard dosage and schedule. The primary endpoint was 1st line PFS, and secondary endpoints were total PFS and OS. The calculated sample size was 59 per group, with α = 0.05, β = 0.10, and a censoring rate of 15%. Results: Of 124 patients enrolled in this study from February 2010 to July 2012 from 39 institutions, 120 could be evaluated (SU/SO, 57 and SO/SU, 63). Baseline patients' characteristics in the SU/SO and SO/SU groups were as follows: favorable risk, 21% and 22%; and presence ofnephrectomy, 88% and 89%, respectively. First-line mPFS was 8.7 and 7.0 months in the SU/SO and SO/SU groups, respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42–1.08; p= 0.095). There was no statistically significant difference in total (T)-PFS, 27.8 M, and 22.6 m (HR 0.73, CI 0.428-1.246; p=0.247), or OS 38.4 m and 30.9 m (HR 0.934, CI 0.588-1.485; p=0.773). Subgroup analyses showed that T-PFS was NR and 27.8 m (p=0.021) in the favorable risk, and 38.4 m and 16.1 m (p=0.009) in with less than 5 metastatic sites, 6.5 m and 13.6 m (p=0.025) without nephrectomy in the SU/SO and SO/SU groups, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) in case of first-line SU or SO (all grade, all cause) were hand–foot syndrome (71% vs. 86%), hypothyroidism (70% vs. 33%), fatigue (57% vs. 40%), hypertension (55% vs. 44%), and diarrhea (23% vs. 38%). AEs were generally lower during second-line therapy. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in first-line PFS, T-PFS, and OS between the two sequential treatments. Although fewer patients received second-line treatment in the SU/SO group, OS in this group was numerically longer than that in the SO/SU group. Clinical trial information: 01481870.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers; Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

01481870

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 6S; abstract 469)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.469

Abstract #

469

Poster Bd #

E8

Abstract Disclosures