Retrospective study comparing survival when ipilimimab used with and without radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma.

Authors

null

Dominique Siobhan Parslow

Tayside health trust, Shields, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Dominique Siobhan Parslow, Toby Laurence James Talbot

Organizations

Tayside health trust, Shields, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CTLA-4, has increased median survival in patients with advanced melanoma from 6.4 to 10 months, with 20% of patients showing a sustained response. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown possible synergistic and abscopal effects between ipilimumab and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare survival curves of patients who have received ipilimumab with and without radiotherapy, and also look at other potential prognostic indicators for patients with advanced melanoma. Methods: Data was collected retrospectively from patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab at Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCH), United Kingdom. The data collection proforma included: demographic details, BRAF status, treatments prior to and since ipilimumab, whether and when radiotherapy given, response, autoimmune phenomena documented, overall survival, and survival time since ipilimumab. Results: 43 patients (20 men and 23 women) have received ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma at RCH between 2011 and 2015. Age range 27-88 years, with a median age of 60 years. 13 were BRAF mutated, 28 were BRAF wild-type and 2 were unknown. 33% of patients who received ipilimumab had some response to it, with 21% achieving a complete response. 25% of patient who displayed autoimmune phenomena clinically responded to ipilimumab; only 15% of those who did not display autoimmune phenomena clinically responded. 20 patients received radiotherapy and 23 did not; there was no significant survival difference related to radiotherapy usage. Patients with the BRAF mutation had a shorter median survival than those who were BRAF wild-type. Conclusions: Although this study was retrospective and not randomised, it appears to show an increased likelihood of a response to ipilimumab in patients who also had autoimmune side effects from treatment. Patients with a BRAF mutation had a shorter median survival than those who were BRAF wild type. The addition of radiotherapy to ipilimumab did not appear to impact on survival or response, although, as the patients were not randomised as to whether they received radiotherapy it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from this.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Biomarkers and Inflammatory Signatures,Humoral Immunity for Diagnosis and Therapy,Immune Checkpoints and Stimulatory Receptors,Modulating Innate Immunity,Therapies Targeting T cells

Sub Track

Antagonists Targeting T-cell Checkpoints

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 7S; abstract 83)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.7_suppl.83

Abstract #

83

Poster Bd #

D2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

BRAF and NRAS mutation status and response to checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma.

First Author: Olivier Jules van Not

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Evaluating clinical responses to BRAF inhibition in BRAF/TERT promoter mutated melanoma.

First Author: Colleen Ciccosanti

First Author: F. Stephen Hodi