A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus carboplatin versus docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after response to prior docetaxel chemotherapy: The RECARDO trial.

Authors

null

Esther W. Bouman-Wammes

VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Esther W. Bouman-Wammes , Linda de Munck , H Pieter van den Berg , Aart Beeker , Carolien H. Smorenburg , Henk M.W. Verheul , Winald R. Gerritsen , Alfonsus Johannes Maria van den Eertwegh

Organizations

VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands, Tergooi Medical Hospital, Hilversum, Netherlands, Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Hoofddorp, Netherlands, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Bennebroek, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Docetaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with castration resistant prostate carcinoma (CRPC). Docetaxel re-challenge has never been tested in a prospective randomized clinical trial. As some studies supported the addition of carboplatin to docetaxel in this setting, we performed a phase II trial investigating the combination of docetaxel plus carboplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy in docetaxel pre-treated CRPC patients. Methods: Patients with CRPC with a progression-free interval (PFI) of at least 3 months after initial treatment with docetaxel were randomized between docetaxel 75mg/m2 or docetaxel 60mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 4, both plus prednisone in a 3-weekly schedule. Treatment was continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or completion of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) (PSA and/or RECIST). Secondary objectives are overall survival, toxicity, PSA response and quality of life. Results: As a result of insufficient recruitment, the study was discontinued early after inclusion of 75 patients, instead of the targeted 150 patients. The median PFS was comparable between both groups (docetaxel 12.7 months versus combination therapy 11.7 months p = 0.99), and no difference in OS was found (median OS 18.5 months versus 18.9 months, p = 0.88). Rates of PSA response were comparable (response/stable PSA in 42.1%/39.4% of the patients in the monotherapy arm versus 35.1%/48.6% in the combination arm, NS). The incidence of grade 3-4 infections and gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects was higher in the docetaxel plus carboplatin arm (GI side effects 0% versus 13.9% p = 0.03; infection 2.7% versus 16.7% p = 0.056). The difference in febrile neutropenia (0% versus 11.1%) is not significant. Conclusions: For patients with CRPC and an initial good response to docetaxel, re-treatment with docetaxel monotherapy is a feasible, save and effective treatment. Addition of carboplatin resulted in more toxicity. Docetaxel re-challenge is a viable therapeutic option for selected patients. Clinical trial information: NTR3070.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NTR3070

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 6S; abstract 166)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.166

Abstract #

166

Poster Bd #

F20

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Simon J. Crabb

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Selection biases in the systematic collection of breast biobank specimens.

First Author: Yael Bar