Integrating cancer survivorship care into allogeneic BMT recovery.

Authors

null

Kelly Bugos

Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA

Kelly Bugos , Sarah Stenger , Andrea Segura Smith , Laura Johnston , Morgan Gross , Gayla Knight , Suzanne Lambert , Lori S. Muffly

Organizations

Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA

Research Funding

Other

Background: AlloBMT patients are at risk for chronic morbidity and late effects. Prior to 2015, the Stanford BMT program conducted group classes at three months post-transplant to prepare alloBMT patients and their families for the transition to survivorship, but no formal cancer survivorship program existed. Cancer survivorship care is required by the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT). In order to fill this gap, we developed a standardized pathway to survivorship care for alloBMT survivors. Aim: To implement an initial cancer survivorship care consultation with comprehensive symptom assessment, late effects monitoring, and development of a survivorship care plan (SCP) three to six months after alloBMT. Methods: Standard work was implemented including patient introduction to survivorship by the BMT nurses and Advanced Practice Providers [APP] and during group ‘moving home’ class; responsibility for referral to survivorship; metric tracking, and administration of patient survey. The survivorship visit included an evaluation by the patient’s BMT social worker, introduction to post-BMT nurse coordinator and consult with cancer survivorship APP. Eligible patients were alloBMT recipients receiving care in the outpatient setting. Results: From July 28, 2015 to January 25, 2016, 90% (66/72) of eligible alloBMT patients were referred to cancer survivorship by day 100, 66% (42/66) of referred patient s were seen in survivorship clinic by day 180, 33% (22/66) deferred the visit or were unreachable, 1% (2/66) died. Of the 42 patients who received a cancer survivorship visit, 38% (13/42) responded to a post-visit survey. Responses indicated the patients believed their health goals and needs were addressed, and a SCP in the context of a comprehensive visit was valuable. Conclusions: Integrating standardized cancer survivorship care into the alloBMT recovery period is feasible, satisfactory to patients, and adds a structured approach for long-term effects monitoring and treatment. Early experience and patient surveys demonstrate value in an individual visits 3-6 months after alloBMT with a focus on returning to life and goal oriented post-transplant care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Care Coordination and Financial Implications, Communication, and Health Promotion

Track

Care Coordination and Financial Implications,Communication,Health Promotion

Sub Track

Models of Care/Medical Homes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 5S; abstr 39)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.5_suppl.39

Abstract #

39

Poster Bd #

D8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mandy Swiecichowski

First Author: Samira Daswani

First Author: Ilana Yurkiewicz