Randomized phase II study of S-1 monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors

null

Makoto Ueno

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Makoto Ueno , Shinichi Ohkawa , Noritoshi Kobayashi , Kazuya Sugimori , Yoshiaki Kawaguchi , Satoshi Kobayashi , Masataka Taguri , Takeharu Yamanaka , Tetsuya Mine

Organizations

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Gemcitabine is one of the standard chemotherapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer in a first-line setting. In a second-line setting, there are various unmet needs. After gemcitabine chemotherapy, S-1 is mainly used and sometimes gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is used. Cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine had been reported to have the potential to be enhanced when used with fluorouracil. This randomized study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.Methods: This phase II study consisted of patients (pts) who were randomly allocated into the GS group (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or the S-1 group (S-1 80, 100, or 120 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 28 of a 42-day cycle) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS). The sample size of 90 pts was chosen based on the randomized phase II selection design reported by Simon et al.(1985). The design suggests a correct selection probability of 75% with two-sided significance level of 0.10 if median PFS is 3.3 mo and 2.0 mo in GS and S-1 groups. Results: From Jan 2012 to March 2015, randomized 51 pts were examined (GS: 26, S-1: 25). This study was discontinued due to slow accrual. The median PFS of GS group was 2.0 mo while the S-1 group was 2.1 mo. The hazard ratio was 1.06 [95%CI 0.60-1.86]; (p=0.844). The median survival times were 3.8 mo in GS group and 5.5 mo in S-1 group, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.02 [95%CI 0.57-1.81]; (p=0.96). The response rates were 4.2% and 4.3%. The disease control rates were 33.4% and 30.4%. Although bone marrow suppression is higher in GS group, the toxicities were manageable in both groups. Grade 3/4 toxicities (GS/S-1 %) included: neutropenia, 53.8/8; hemoglobin, 30.8/28.0; thrombocytopenia, 7.7/4.0; nausea, 0/8.0; anorexia 11.5/16.0, fatigue 7.7/0 and diarrhea, 3.8/4.0. Conclusions: Gemcitabine plus S-1 is not more effective than S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: 000007173.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

000007173

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 4S; abstract 429)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.429

Abstract #

429

Poster Bd #

K13

Abstract Disclosures