Cancer survivorship care in rural community: Provider perspective.

Authors

null

Katia Noyes

SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

Katia Noyes , David Holub , Irfan Rizvi , Alex Swanger , Coty Reisdorf , Kenneth Tomaszewski , Louis S. Constine

Organizations

SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, KJT Group, Honeoye Falls, NY

Research Funding

Other

Background: Advances in oncologic sciences have resulted in successful treatments for many cancers with improved survival for millions of patients. Efficient delivery of cancer care now requires not only skills and professionalism of each provider but also well-orchestrated performances of multiple oncology, primary care and social services providers acting as one multidisciplinary team. It is unknown, however, whether providers are prepared for and accept their new roles in patient cancer care teams across region. This study assessed perspectives of providers involved in care for patients with cancer about their changing roles. Methods: We conducted a focus group with a diverse group of stakeholders involved in cancer care (2 primary care physicians, 1 rural surgeon, 2 rural oncologists, 2 oncology nurses, 2 cancer patients and a caregiver). The focus group was conducted using ThinkTank software, a collaborative tool that allows participants to communicate virtually in real time, screen share, express preferences and confidentially rank each other responses. We also conducted two traditional focus groups with rural care managers, nurses, social workers and public health providers. Results: The focus groups identified significant differences in attitudes and beliefs toward regional team-based cancer care between various providers. PCPs ranked oncology issues as less important to their practices compared to other chronic conditions associated with performance metrics and financial incentives. APPs ranked care coordination issues as more important compared to PCP rankings from the same practices. Rural providers identified limited staffing, outdated health IT systems, and lack of expertise as major barriers to multidisciplinary team care. Both patients and providers highlighted importance of trust and face-to-face communication in treatment adherence and choice of care setting. Conclusions: Current health information systems, performance metrics and payment models represent significant barriers to integrated care delivery in oncology and survivorship. Successful implementation of efficient and sustainable regional oncology program will require a multi-dimensional intervention to address each of these barriers.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Care Coordination and Financial Implications, Communication, and Health Promotion

Track

Care Coordination and Financial Implications,Communication,Health Promotion

Sub Track

Survivorship Care Plans

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 5S; abstr 50)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.5_suppl.50

Abstract #

50

Poster Bd #

E7

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Shift in survivorship care delivery.

First Author: Elizabeth Boutin McGrath

Abstract

2018 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Delivery of survivorship care from rural primary care and oncology practices.

First Author: Jennifer R. Klemp

Abstract

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a cancer survivorship care delivery intervention.

First Author: Sarah A. Birken