Preoperative vascular grading in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer: Does radiologic arterial or venous involvement predict margin status?

Authors

null

Sanjay S. Reddy

Fox Chase Cancer Ctr, Philadelphia, PA

Sanjay S. Reddy , Andreas Karachristos , Karen Ruth , John Parker Hoffman

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Ctr, Philadelphia, PA, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: The use of neoadjuvant therapy has been widely used for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BLRPC). Controversy exists on the definition of BLRPC, and because of this, we examined the association of vascular involvement and margin status in patients who had initial resection. Methods: Records of 137 patients who had surgery for resectable or BLRPC were collected. Included were radiologist grading of venous/arterial involvement based on preoperative imaging. For patients with both staging recorded, we categorized vascular involvement as none, arterial only, venous only, or both. We examined the association of vascular involvement and margin status using Chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results: Of 137 patients, all underwent surgery first. 85% had a Whipple without vascular resection, and 13% with. Of 134 patients with Ishikawa staging, there were 63% stage I, 17% stage II, 11% stage III, and 9% stage IV. Of 96 patients with arterial staging, there were 74% stage i, 16% stage ii, and 10% stage iii. Of 93 patients with both Ishikawa and arterial staging recorded, 61% had no vascular involvement, 7% arterial, 14% venous, and 17% had both. Ishikawa stage I-IV was associated with a positive SMA margin, and was seen in 14%, 44%, 53%, and 58%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, for arterial staging the association was weaker, and for arterial stages i-iii, a positive SMA margin was seen in 20%, 40%, and 40%, respectively (p = 0.06). Therefore, Ishikawa staging was more predicative of arterial involvement. Higher Ishikawa staging was associated with increased positive SMV margins; 5%, 26%, 33%, respectively (p < 0.001), while preoperative arterial staging was not predictive (p = 0.63). In logistic regression for any positive margin, only venous staging was significant in predicting a positive margin. Conclusions: The use of imaging in predicting positive margins is more accurate when using a venous grading system as opposed to an arterial one. With a more standard approach of designating degree of vein involvement, and better preoperative imaging, further studies will be needed to substantiate these findings.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Translational Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 4S; abstract 319)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.319

Abstract #

319

Poster Bd #

E11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Factors associated with the receipt of surgery in acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas.

First Author: Jasleen Kaur Chaddha

First Author: Zehua Wu

First Author: Rish Pai