Referral patterns and characteristics of uninsured versus insured patients referred to the outpatient supportive care center (SCC) at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors

Ahsan Azhar

Ahsan Azhar

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Ahsan Azhar, Sriram Yennu, Aashraya Ramu, Haibo Zhang, Ali Haider, Janet L. Williams, Eduardo Bruera

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: Multiple barriers exist in providing quality palliative care to low-income patients with cancer. Such disparities may negatively influence effective management of symptoms including pain. Our objective was to compare referral patterns and characteristics (level of symptom distress) of uninsured vs insured patients. Methods: We reviewed randomly selected charts of 100 Indigent (IND) and 100 Medicaid (MC) patients and compared them with a random sample of 300 patients with insurance (INS) referred during the same time period (1/2010 to 12/2014) to our SCC. Data was collected for date of registration at the cancer center, diagnosis of Advanced Cancer (ACD), first visit to the SCC (PC1), symptom assessment (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-ESAS) at PC1. We excluded self-pay patients. Results: Results for IND, MC and INS (n = 481) respectively are as follows: Mean (SD) Age in yrs. was 50 (12), 48 (11) and 63 (13); p < 0.001. Percentage of non-white was 44%, 51% and 19.5%; p < 0.001. Percentage of unmarried patients was 64%, 68% and 33%; p < 0.001. Mean (SD) ESAS score at PC1 for pain was 5.6 (3.2), 6.7 (2.5), 4.9 (3.2); p < 0.001. Percentage of patients on opioids upon referral was 86%, 62%, and 54%; p < 0.001. Mean (SD) for referral time in months from ACD to PC1 was 8.7 (SD 10.4), 12.3 (SD 18.1) and 12 (SD 19.9) p = 0.31; for no. of encounters with SC per month were 0.46 (0.45), 0.41 (0.46) and 0.3 (0.55); p = 0.01; for survival in months (PC1 to last contact) was 6.4 (5.8), 5.6 (6.4) & 6 (7.22) p = 0.77. Conclusions: Uninsured patients had significantly higher levels of pain, were more frequently on opioids, younger, non-white and not married. They also required a larger number of SCC encounters. Insurance status did not impact timing of SCC referral or SCC follow ups at our cancer center.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Evaluation and Assessment of Patient Symptoms and Quality of Life,Integration and Delivery of Palliative Care in Cancer Care

Sub Track

Barriers to care across systems

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 26S; abstr 116)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.116

Abstract #

116

Poster Bd #

E6

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Long-acting opioids as a trigger for palliative care consultation in pancreatic cancer.

First Author: Richa Thakur

First Author: Ahsan Azhar

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Opioid screening and urine toxicology results in outpatient oncology palliative medicine.

First Author: Jai Narendra Patel

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Quality of pain management in patients with cancer in the outpatient setting.

First Author: Biplov Adhikari