Rolapitant for the prevention of nausea in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Rudolph M. Navari

Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, Cancer Control Program, World Health Organization, South Bend, IN

Rudolph M. Navari, Cindy K Nagy, Sujata Arora, Daniel Powers, Rebecca Anne Clark-Snow

Organizations

Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, Cancer Control Program, World Health Organization, South Bend, IN, Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, South Bend, IN, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Nausea control remains an unmet need for patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC, HEC). The objective of this analysis was to determine the effect of the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist rolapitant (VARUBI) on the prevention of nausea in patients receiving either MEC or HEC. Methods: Post hoc analyses of nausea from three randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials were performed for carboplatin-based MEC (n = 401), non-carboplatin-based MEC (n = 228), total MEC (n = 629), anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy (n = 703), and cisplatin-based HEC (n = 1070). Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral rolapitant 180 mg or placebo ~1–2 h before chemotherapy. All patients received active control: granisetron 2 mg oral or 10 mcg/kg IV and oral dexamethasone 20 mg. Granisetron was continued on days 2 and 3 for patients receiving MEC or AC-based therapy and dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily on days 2–4 for patients receiving HEC. Patients self-assessed nausea on days 1–6 using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Percentage of patients with no nausea (NN; maximum VAS < 5 mm) or no significant nausea (NSN; maximum VAS < 25 mm) was determined for overall, delayed, and acute phases of CINV in cycle 1. Results: Rates of NN in the carboplatin-based MEC and total MEC subgroups were significantly higher (P< 0.05) with rolapitant than active control in the delayed and overall phases. In the cisplatin-based HEC subgroup, rates of NN and NSN were significantly higher (P < 0.05) with rolapitant than active control in the delayed, acute, and overall phases. Conclusions: Rolapitant prevents nausea during all CINV phases in patients receiving cisplatin-based HEC, and during the delayed and overall phases in patients receiving carboplatin-based MEC. Clinical trial information: NCT01500226, NCT01499849, NCT01500213

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Biologic Basis of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Management/Prevention of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psychosocial and Spiritual Care,Communication in Advanced Cancer

Sub Track

Treatment toxicity

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01500226, NCT01499849, NCT01500213

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 26S; abstr 224)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.224

Abstract #

224

Poster Bd #

H14

Abstract Disclosures