Efficacy of rolapitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers.

Authors

null

Rudolph M. Navari

Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, South Bend, IN

Rudolph M. Navari, Karin Jordan, Bernardo Leon Rapoport, Ian D. Schnadig, Martin Chasen, Sujata Arora, Daniel Powers, Lee Steven Schwartzberg

Organizations

Indiana University School of Medicine South Bend, South Bend, IN, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany, The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa, Compass Oncology, US Oncology Research, Tualatin, OR, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, The West Clinic, Memphis, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Rolapitant (VARUBI) is a selective, long-acting neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA) for the prevention of CINV. Rolapitant effectively prevented CINV in phase 3 trials of patients (pts) receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC, MEC). While MEC and HEC regimens are commonly used to treat pts with gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers (GI/CRC), very few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of a neurokinin-1 RA regimen in these pts. We assessed the incidence of CINV and efficacy of rolapitant in a subset of pts with GI/CRC. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of 3 similarly-designed, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Pts with cancer of the esophagus, stomach, colon/rectum, or anus received a single oral dose of 180 mg oral rolapitant or placebo prior to HEC or MEC. All pts received a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) RA and dexamethasone (active control). The HEC studies included cisplatin, and the MEC study carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, epirubicin, and doxorubicin. Endpoints included complete response (CR; no emesis and no use of rescue medication), no emesis, no nausea (maximum visual analogue scale [VAS] < 5 mm), no significant nausea (maximum VAS < 25mm) and complete protection (CP; no emesis, no use of rescue medication, and no significant nausea) in the overall (0-120 h), acute (≤ 24 h), and delayed (> 24-120 h) phases. Results: Out of 188 GI/CRC pts, 101 pts received rolapitant and 87 received active control. Pts treated with rolapitant had significantly higher rates of CR, no nausea, no emesis, and CP in the overall phase (P < 0.05). Rolapitant was well-tolerated and overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events comparable in both groups. Conclusions: Addition of rolapitant to 5-HT3RA and dexamethasone therapy significantly improved CR, no nausea, no emesis, and CP in pts with GI/CRC receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01500226, NCT01499849, NCT01500213

Endpoint, %Pooled HEC/MEC
Rolapitant (n = 101)Control (n = 87)p-value
Overall phase
    Complete response73.348.3< 0.001
    No emesis77.256.30.002
    No significant nausea69.358.60.128
    No nausea52.531.00.003
    Complete protection64.441.40.002

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Biologic Basis of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psycho-oncology,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Management/Prevention of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Psychosocial and Spiritual Care,Communication in Advanced Cancer

Sub Track

Treatment toxicity

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01500226, NCT01499849, NCT01500213

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 26S; abstr 222)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.222

Abstract #

222

Poster Bd #

H12

Abstract Disclosures