Quality of life (QOL) to predict overall survival (OS) in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).

Authors

null

Felicia Roncolato

St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Felicia Roncolato , Emma Gibbs , Chee Lee , Lucy Claire Davies , Val Gebski , Michael Friedlander , Felix Hilpert , Lari B. Wenzel , Martin R. Stockler , Madeleine Trudy King , Eric Pujade-Lauraine

Organizations

St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia, ANZGOG, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia, Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Hopital Hotel Dieu, Paris, France

Research Funding

Other

Background: Women with PROC are a heterogeneous group with a median overall survival of 12 months. We hypothesised that QOL measures would be significant prognostic factors in PROC and improve predictions of survival based on clinical factors. Methods: Data from 333 participants in AURELIA, randomised phase 3 trial of chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab, was used to identify domains of QOL, measured at baseline with the EORTC QLQ-C30 & OV28, that were significantly associated with OS in Cox regression analyses. Cut-points were determined to categorise patients as low, medium and high risk groups. Multivariable analysis for categorised QOL domains significantly associated with OS was performed adjusting for established clinical prognostic factors. Cut-points were validated in an independent dataset, CARTAXHY, a randomised trial comparing different chemotherapies in PROC. Results: In AURELIA, physical functioning (PF), role, emotional, social, global health, and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (AGS) scores were significantly associated with OS in univariable analyses. PF (P < 0.001) and AGS (P < 0.001) scores remained significant in multivariable models. When categorized into high (PF score < 67), medium (67-92), and low ( > 92) risks, mOS were 11.2, 14.7 and 19.3 months respectively (P < 0.001). These categories were applied in the CARTAXHY population (N = 136), and mOS were 7.9, 16.2 and 23.9 months (P < 0.001) respectively. For high (AGS score > 44), medium (13-44), and low ( < 13) risks, mOS were 11.9, 14.3, and 20.0 months in AURELIA (P < 0.001); and 10.5, 19.6, and 24.1 months in CARTAXHY (P = 0.001). PF (P = 0.048) and AGS (P = 0.011) remained independently significant prognostic factors after adjusting for performance status, ascites, CA125, platinum-free interval, primary platinum resistance, and size of measurable lesions. Conclusions: Self-ratings of physical functioning and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptom scores improved predictions of overall survival based on traditional clinical factors in PROC. This additional prognostic information could improve stratification in clinical trials, patient-doctor-communication about prognosis, and clinical decision-making. Clinical trial information: NCT00976911

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00976911

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 5575)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5575

Abstract #

5575

Poster Bd #

398

Abstract Disclosures