Myeloablative busulfan/melphalan (BuMel) consolidation following induction chemotherapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study.

Authors

null

Meaghan Granger

Cook Children's Health Care System, Fort Worth, TX

Meaghan Granger , Gregory A. Yanik , Arlene Naranjo , Jeannine S. McCune , Steven G. DuBois , Rochelle Bagatell , Brian D. Weiss , Stephan A. Grupp , Sheena Cretella Tenney , Shahab Asgharzadeh , Michael D. Hogarty , Joseph Ezra Panoff , John Han-Chih Chang , Julie M Gastier-Foster , Denise Mills , Julie R. Park

Organizations

Cook Children's Health Care System, Fort Worth, TX, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Merion Station, PA, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Gainesville, FL, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, University of Miami, Miami, FL, Lutheran General Cancer Care Ctr, Park Ridge, IL, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: The COG conducted a groupwide study of a Busulfan/Melphalan (BuMel) myeloablative regimen in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk neuroblastoma (ANBL12P1). Previously used in SIOP-EN studies, this is the first trial using BuMel following a COG induction platform. The primary objective was regimen-related toxicity, with a specific focus on pulmonary and hepatic events. Methods: Five cycles of induction were administered, followed by intravenous busulfan (daily, days -6 to -3), melphalan (140mg/m2, day -1) and stem cell rescue. Age and weight based dosing were used for busulfan administration. First dose busulfan pharmacokinetics were mandated and adjustments made to target an AUC <5500 (micromole/liter)*minute. Following hematologic recovery, patients were eligible to receive external beam radiotherapy to primary and residual metastatic sites and then proceed to maintenance immunotherapy. Unacceptable pulmonary toxicity was defined as Grade 4 pulmonary events (CTCAEv.4.0). Sinusoidal Obstructive Syndrome (SOS) was a composite definition using Baltimore criteria. Results: Between 4/2013 and 4/2015, 150 patients were enrolled. One hundred thirteen patients were evaluable for end-induction response assessment, with 27 (25%) CR, 27 (24%) VGPR and 39 (35%) PR, for an overall response rate of 82%. At the time of consolidation, 101 patients are evaluable for toxicity. The incidence of unacceptable pulmonary toxicity was 3.0% (n = 3), SOS 5.9% (n = 6), and combined hepato-pulmonary toxicity 8.9% (N = 9) during consolidation (days 0–28). There were 0 toxic deaths during consolidation. For all subjects (n=98), the median busulfan AUC was 3554 (range: 2360-4555) micromole/liter*minute, with a median AUC of 4558 (range: 3462-5189) micromole/liter*minute for those developing SOS (n =6) and 3232 (range: 3010-5037) micromole/liter*minute for those developing severe pulmonary toxicity (n= 3). Conclusions: BuMel following COG induction regimen is well tolerated with acceptable pulmonary and hepatic toxicity in high-risk neuroblastoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01798004

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Pediatric Oncology

Track

Pediatric Oncology

Sub Track

Pediatric Solid Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01798004

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 10528)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.10528

Abstract #

10528

Poster Bd #

219

Abstract Disclosures