A retrospective study of SPAG5 expression and its clinical implications in >8,000 patients of ER positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC): Genomic, transcriptomic and protein analysis.

Authors

null

Tarek M. A. Abdel-Fatah

Nottingham University City Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Tarek M. A. Abdel-Fatah , Devika Agarwal , Dong-Xu Liu , Roslin Russell , Oscar M Rueda , Lorinc Pongor , Balazs Gyorffy , Paul M Moseley , Andrew Green , A Graham Pockley , Robert Rees , Carlos Caldas , Ian O. Ellis , Graham Ball , Stephen Chan

Organizations

Nottingham University City Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Nottingham Trent University - The John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom, The University of Auckland - Liggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Division of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Nottingham University Hospital City Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: We recently have identified SPAG5 as a novel oncogene that was common in PAM50 Luminal B. Herein, we test the prognostic and predictive significance of SPAG5 gene, transcript and protein expression in ER+ BC. Methods: The correlation between SPAG5 gene copy number aberrations and its transcript with BC specific survival (BCSS) were determined in the ER+ subgroup of the METABRIC (Molecular Taxonomy of BC International Consortium; n = 1498), the Cancer Genome Atlas BC project (TCGA BRCA; n = 709) and in publically available ER+ BC genomic datasets (n = 3044). The relationship between SPAG5 mRNA and protein expression with relapse free survival (RFS) was studied in untreated lymph node negative ER+ BC (n = 606 and 588; respectively) and in ER+ patients treated with 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (n = 876 and 429; respectively). The relationship between the pathological complete response (pCR) after anthracycline neoadjuvant chemotherapy (AC Neo ACT) with SPAG5mRNA [(MD Anderson cohort (n = 297) and NCT00455533 phase II trial (n = 101)] and protein expression [Nottingham cohort; (n = 200)] was also tested. The median values of SPAG5 mRNA and protein expression were used as cut-offs. Results:SPAG5 gain/amplification was found in 165/1498 (11%; METABRIC) and 137/709 (19.3%; TCGA-BRCA) of ER+ BCs, and was more common in ER+HER2+ compared to ER+HER2- (31.3% vs., 13.6%) and was associated with shorter BCSS (HR (CI 95%): 1.55 (1.18-2.04), p = 0.00021). In untreated ER+LN- and tamoxifen treated ER+Luminal A BC, mRNA SPAG5+ was associated with shorter RFS [(HR (CI 95%): 1.25 (1.11-1.42), p = 0.0003) and [(HR (CI 95%): 1.66 (1.16-2.39), p = 0.0053); respectively]. In tamoxifen treated ER+Luminal B BC SPAG5 mRNA (+) and (-) had similar RFS (HR (CI 95%): 1.15 (0.76-1.74), p = 0.50). Multivariable logistic regression model showed SPAG5mRNA+ to predict pCR in ER+ BC treated with AC Neo ACT [MD Anderson cohort (OR (95%CI): 2·18 (1·08-4·38); p = 0·029 and Phase II trial (OR (CI 95%): 3·83 (1·01-14·55); p = 0·049)]. Conclusions: SPAG5 is a prognostic biomarker that predicts response to AC-Neo-ACT in ER+BC which can help to optimize systemic treatment in luminal B-BC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 575)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.575

Abstract #

575

Poster Bd #

63

Abstract Disclosures