Physicians’ perspectives on multidisciplinary (MD) lung cancer care in a community-based hospital setting.

Authors

null

Satish Kedia

University of Memphis, Memphis, TN

Satish Kedia , Kenneth Daniel Ward , Codruta Andy Collins , Siri Alicia Digney , Bianca Michelle Jackson , Fedoria Elaine Rugless Stewart , Nicholas Ryan Faris , Kristina S. Roark , Raymond U. Osarogiagbon

Organizations

University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, TN, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN

Research Funding

Other

Background: The MD care model is recommended to improve the quality of lung cancer care, which is complex and involves multiple specialties. Physicians’ feedback on the management of lung cancer care is essential to improve the quality of care for lung cancer patients. Methods: We conducted focus groups with lung cancer specialists (pulmonologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, primary care physicians, hospitalists, and ER doctors) from both multidisciplinary and traditional clinical settings. Grounded Theory methodology guided the identification of recurrent themes that emerged from qualitative data analysis using Dedoose software. Results: 37 physicians participated in 9 focus groups. Almost all physicians agreed that the MD model could be beneficial for patients in terms of receiving high quality, efficient, and well-coordinated care. However, many felt that co-location was not an optimal use of their time and resources. Financial disincentives and time constraints were identified as major deterrents to full participation in a MD clinic. Several physicians were concerned that a MD clinic could compromise their referral base, and impact their own practice. Another perceived barrier was the challenge of integrating a MD care model into the existing health care system, which may not be positioned to provide co-located services efficiently. The team-based approach of MD care raised some uncertainty about who would be designated as the primary physician responsible for a patient’s care, and make final decisions about treatment. Suggested ways to improve implementation of the MD model included educating physicians about the availability of an MD clinic, establishing efficient processes for initial consultations, implementing technology for virtual participation, and using a nurse navigator with reliable closed-loop communication. Conclusions: Physicians generally agreed that the multidisciplinary model could improve lung cancer care, but they perceived significant personal, institutional, and system level barriers that need to be addressed in order to implement a MD system in a community healthcare setting succesfully.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Care Delivery/Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 6544)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.6544

Abstract #

6544

Poster Bd #

31

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Multidisciplinary education and action to foster equitable cancer care.

First Author: Monica Augustyniak

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Real-world program-based lung cancer care.

First Author: Wei Liao

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Regional appendix cancer multidisciplinary case conference: Improving access and care of a rare disease.

First Author: Jenna Nimer