Outcomes of patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who discontinue idelalisib treatment.

Authors

Jennifer Brown

Jennifer R. Brown

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Jennifer R. Brown , Paolo Ghia , Jeffrey Alan Jones , Andrew Pettitt , Jeff Porter Sharman , Loic Ysebaert , Stephan Stilgenbauer , Yeonhee Kim , Terry Newcomb , Nai-Shun Yao , Richard R. Furman

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Universita Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, University of Liverpool, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom, US Oncology Network/Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Springfield, OR, Department of Haematology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopôle, Toulouse, France, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Idelalisib (IDELA) is effective in the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. Nonetheless, pts may discontinue (D/C) IDELA due to progressive disease (PD) or adverse events (AEs). In this post hoc analysis, we examined the outcomes of pts with R/R CLL who D/C IDELA and the relationship of these outcomes to IDELA exposure. Methods: Data were pooled for pts treated with IDELA + rituximab (NCT01539512, n = 110), IDELA monotherapy (NCT01539291, extension study), and IDELA + ofatumumab (NCT01659021, n = 173). Time-dependent endpoints, including time to next therapy (TTNT), time to PD (TTPD), and time to death (TTD), were calculated from the dates of permanent IDELA D/C. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS) from the date of randomization. Subgroup analyses of OS were performed using the integrated safety data set. Results: Of 283 pts in the safety population, 124 (44%) remained on IDELA, 28 (10%) D/C due to PD, and 131 (46%) D/C for non-PD reasons (AEs, n = 87; “other” reasons, n = 44 [death, n = 7; study withdrawal, n = 21; physician’s decision, n = 14; other, n = 2]). Clinical outcomes for these D/C groups (excluding “other”) are presented in the table. Pts who D/C IDELA due to PD also had longer median IDELA exposure (11 vs 8 mo) than those who D/C due to AEs. Conclusions: Pts who were required to discontinue IDELA due to AEs survived no longer than those required to discontinue due to PD. OS was similar among pts who D/C IDELA, regardless of reason for D/C. Analyses of patient characteristics, type of PD and dose intensities associated with IDELA D/C, as well as outcomes based on timing of D/C due to AEs (early vs late), are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01539512, NCT01539291, NCT01659021

IDELA Ongoing
(n = 124)
D/C IDELA Due to PD
(n = 28)
D/C IDELA Due to AE
(n = 87)
Baseline -17p/TP53mut, n (%)46 (37.1)15 (53.6)36 (41.4)
Median (95% CI) OS, moNR (NR, NR)18.8 (15.5, NR)20.9 (15.8, NR)
OS at 24 mo, %10044.433.4
TTPDn = 0n = 28n = 41
Median (95% CI), moN/AN/A0.8 (0.0, 8.7)
TTNTn = 0n = 7n = 15
Median (95% CI), moN/A0.9 (0.2, 3.7)4.6 (1, 20.7)
TTDn = 0n = 9n = 32
Median (95% CI), moN/A2.4 (0.1, 9.9)0.7 (0.1, 9.1)

NR = not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Hairy Cell

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01539512, NCT01539291, NCT01659021

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 7531)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.7531

Abstract #

7531

Poster Bd #

87

Abstract Disclosures