Validation of a thrombosis risk assessment model in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors

null

Brea Lipe

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

Brea Lipe , Hailey Baker , Brandon Weckbaugh , Carol Webb , Alexandra Brown , Jonathan Mahnken , Theresa Shireman

Organizations

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Kansas City, KS, Brown University, Providence, RI

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Within their first year of diagnosis, as many as 1 in 3 multiple myeloma (MM) patients will experience a venous thromboembolism (VTE). The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has issued thromboprophylaxis guidelines that stratify patients into low or high risk for thrombosis and subsequently recommend aspirin (ASA, low risk) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or therapeutic warfarin ( high risk). We conducted a matched case-control study to determine if these guidelines are used in practice, and when they are, if they result in fewer VTEs for MM patients. Methods: The Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration (HERON) database was used to identify case patients with MM and a VTE. Controls, patients with MM who had not experienced a VTE, were matched (~ 1:3) to the cases based on gender, age (+/- 5 years), and time of diagnosis (+/- 5 years). Patient charts were manually extracted to identify treatment history, disease history, and risk factors for VTE. We then evaluated the distribution of risk of VTE per the IMWG guidelines with use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Using conditional logistic regression, we examined an association between risk of VTE, medications use, and the interaction between risk category for the matched patients at the time of diagnosis and at the time of the VTE. Results: There were a total of 297 patients in the final cohort, 86 cases and 211 controls. The median time from diagnosis to VTE was 952 days. Patients with a higher risk of VTE were more likely to be on LMWH or warfarin versus ASA or no prophylaxis (p < .001). We did not find an association between risk category or prophylactic medication with the rate of VTE when considering baseline risk factors. The risk category of case patients changed to a higher risk group over time and this was associated with a higher risk of clot (p = .06). Conclusions: Our data suggest that VTE in MM may occur later in the disease process than has historically been reported. While we were unable to validate the IMWG recommendations for thromboprophylaxis at diagnosis, our results suggest that the risk for VTE may change over time and that patient’s require ongoing assessment of VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis throughout the disease course.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 8055)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.8055

Abstract #

8055

Poster Bd #

320

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Hannah Dysinger McLaughlin

First Author: Manoranjan Mahapatra