University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Eric Jay Small , Lawrence Fong , David I. Quinn , Charles G. Drake , Dwayne Campogan , Tuyen Vu , Nadeem Anwar Sheikh , Nancy N. Chang , Daniel Peter Petrylak
Background: Immune responses to Sip-T in mCRPC patients (pts) correlate with survival (NEJM 2010;363:411). Adding Abi or Enz to Sip-T does not blunt Sip-T immune responses (CCR 2015;21:3862; JCO 2015;33 suppl:abs 5040). It is unknown if pts with primary resistance (1ores) to Abi or Enz have impaired Sip-T immune responses. Methods: STAMP (NCT01487863) and STRIDE (NCT01981122) are similar randomized phase 2 studies. mCRPC pts received Abi (n=69) or Enz (n=52) concurrently (Con) with or sequentially (Seq) after Sip-T. In vitro immune activation was assessed by antigen presenting cell (APC) activation in each Sip-T product. In vivo immune responses were assessed by cellular (ELISPOT and proliferation assays) and humoral (ELISA) immune responses to target antigens PA2024 and PAP. Pts with a PSA decline from baseline (BL) of ³50% were defined as Abi/Enz sensitive (sens); those with <50% PSA decline had 1o res. Immune responses in Abi/Enz sens and 1ores pts were retrospectively analyzed, in each trial, in pooled Con vs Seq arms across trials, and for all pooled data. Results: The % of pts with Abi/Enz sens was similar across pooled arms (Con: 72%; Seq 68%). No differences were seen in in vitro or in vivo immune responses for Abi/Enz sens vs 1ores pts at any time point (see Table). Conclusions: The magnitude of in vitro and in vivo immune responses after Sip-T appear to be independent of androgen sensitivity (i.e. PSA decline) to Abi or Enz, suggesting that Sip T therapy may have a role in pts with primary Abi or Enz resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT01981122 and NCT01487863
All pooled data | Abi/Enz sens (n=82) | Abi/Enz 1o res (n=35) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Age,* y | 69 (43–88) | 74 (57–91) | <0.05 |
Gleason sum ³8, n (%) | 51 (64) | 19 (56) | NS |
BL PSA,‡ ng/mL | 13 (5–49) | 31 (10–66) | <0.01 |
BL LDH,‡ U/L | 187 (161–214) | 199 (164–218) | NS |
Cumulative APC activation‡ | 35.5 (26.7–43.5) | 34.5 (28.6–43.9) | NS |
T cell ELISPOT count‡,§ | 16.3 (3.7–94.7) | 13.8 (0.7–46) | NS# |
T cell proliferation stimulation index‡,§ | 10.9 (3.8–24.2) | 8.7 (4.0–21.8) | |
Antibody titers (ELISA)‡,§, x103 | 51.2 (12.8–102.4) | 25.6 (6.4–102.4) |
Median (*range/‡IQR); (%); §wk 6 for PA2024; #NS = not statistically significant at any time point, i.e. BL, wks 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 20, 26, 40, 52, 56 for PA2024 and PAP (data not shown).
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Amit Bahl
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Christopher Sweeney
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Daniel Peter Petrylak
2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Antonin Broyelle