Open-label phase Ib study of entinostat (E), and lapatinib (L) alone, and in combination with trastuzumab (T) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic (mHER2+) breast cancer after progression on trastuzumab.

Authors

Bora Lim

Bora Lim

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Bora Lim , Rashmi Krishna Murthy , Summer Jackson , Jie S. Willey , Jangsoon Lee , Ricardo H. Alvarez , Carlos Hernando Barcenas , Meghan Sri Karuturi , Nuhad K. Ibrahim , Daniel J. Booser , Stacy L. Moulder , Sharon Hermes Giordano , Abenaa M. Brewster , Ronald Stewart Walters , Powel Brown , Debu Tripathy , Vicente Valero , Naoto T. Ueno

Organizations

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, GA, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Health Services Research, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Office of the Executive Vice President (EVP) and Physician-in-Chief, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: Entinostat (E) an HDAC inhibitor, and Lapatinib (L) given in combination induces FOXO3a and mediates Bim1 expression in HER2+ cell lines resulting in apoptosis [Lee et al. BCRT 2014], providing rationale for this NCI/CTEP sponsored phase 1b trial of E and L +/- T in mHER2+ breast cancer. Methods: A 3+3 phase 1b design was used to determine MTD. Group 1 received E and L. Group 2 received E, L and T. MTD was E 15mg q 2 wks, L 1250mg q 28 days (Group 1), E 12mg q 2 wks, L 1000 mg q 28 days and T 8mg/kg -> 6mg/kg q 3 wks (Group 2); 11 pts received E, L and T at MTD in an expansion cohort. Results: 37 pts were enrolled (15 Group 1, 11 Group 2, and 11 dose expansion); 18 had evaluable circulating tumor cells (isolated using ApoCell’s ApoStream technology) with Akt, HER2, EGFR for further correlative analysis. Median age was 52 (26-72 yo), received 3 (1-15 lines) previous therapies; 13 pts in Group 1, and 19 pts in Group 2/expansion had evaluable response to date. Total 9(24%) pts had clinical benefit (CB=CR, PR, SD at 6mo), 7(54%) pts with prior lapatinib had CB. CBR in metastatic IBC was 23%. Efficacy and toxicity summarized in table 1. Final clinical and correlative results will be reported at presentation. Conclusions: The entinostat, lapatinib and trastuzumab (ELT) regimen was safe and effective in pts who progressed on trastuzumab, even in those with prior lapatinib exposure. These results justify further evaluation of entinostat in combination with HER2 targeted therapy to overcome resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT01434303

Clinical efficacy and toxicity.

IBCPrior LResponseGrade 3 toxicityGrade 4 toxicity
Group 16/157/15CR (1), SD (4) CB (1)Rash (2)
Abdominal pain + dyspnea (1)
Neutropenia
(1 each at 12mg and 15mg)
Group 2 +
expansion
7/226/22CR (2), PR(3), SD (6)
CB (6)
2pts ongoing
Diarrhea (1 each at 10mg and 12mg)
Neutropenia (2 at 12 mg)
Leukopenia (1 at 12mg)
Anemia (1 at 12mg)
Thrombocytopenia (1 at 12mg)
Hypokalemia
(1 at 12mg)
Thrombocytopenia
(1 each at 12mg and 15mg)

CR: complete response, PR: partial response, SD: stable disease at 4 mo, (*):* number of pts; L: lapatinib

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01434303

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 609)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.609

Abstract #

609

Poster Bd #

97

Abstract Disclosures