Prognostic and predictive blood-based biomarkers (BMs) in patients (pts) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with carboplatin–paclitaxel (CP) ± bevacizumab (BEV): Results from GOG-0218.

Authors

Angeles Secord

Angeles Alvarez Secord

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Angeles Alvarez Secord , David Tritchler , Yingmiao Liu , Mark D. Starr , John C. Brady , Heather A. Lankes , Herbert Hurwitz , Robert S. Mannel , Krishnansu Sujata Tewari , David M. O'Malley , Heidi J. Gray , Jamie Nadine Bakkum-Gamez , Keiichi Fujiwara , Matthew Boente , Wei Deng , Robert Allen Burger , Michael J. Birrer , Andrew B. Nixon

Organizations

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, GOG Statistical and Data Center, Buffalo, NY, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Gynecologic Oncology Group, Buffalo, NY, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Mayo Clinic, Byron, MN, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan, Minnesota Onc and Hem, Edina, MN, Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Buffalo, NY, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Massachusetts General Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: GOG-0218, a double-blind placebo (PLA) controlled phase III trial of 1873 pts with advanced EOC, compared CP with either PLA (CPP), BEV 15 mg/kg q3w → PLA (CPB15), or BEV 15 mg/kg q3w → BEV for 15 mo (CPB15+). Study results demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), but no overall survival (OS) benefit with BEV. Blood samples were collected for BM analyses. Methods: Plasma samples were analyzed via multiplex ELISA technology for 5 pre-specified candidate BMs (IL6, Ang-2, osteopontin (OPN), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), and VEGF-D). Associations of BMs’ baseline values with PFS and OS were assessed as continuous variables using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models including the covariates age, stage, debulking status and performance status. Predictive markers were identified using treatment by marker interaction term in multivariate Cox models. Results: Baseline samples were available from 752 pts. According to our pre-specified analysis plan, IL6 was strongly predictive of a therapeutic advantage with BEV for both PFS and OS. Pts with high IL6 levels treated with BEV had longer PFS (14.2 vs. 8.7 mo) and OS (39.6 vs. 33.3 mo) compared to PLA. Increasing IL6 levels were associated with greater benefit from BEV. For PFS: Low IL6, HR 0.87 [CI 0.70-1.08]; Median, HR 0.77 [CI 0.58–1.01]; High, HR 0.67 [CI 0.48–0.94]; interaction p=0.009; for OS: Low IL6, HR 1.07 [CI 0.84–1.37]; Median, HR 0.92 [CI 0.67–1.26]; and High, HR 0.79 [CI 0.54–1.16]; interaction p=0.005. Additionally, both IL6 and OPN were found to be negative prognostic markers for both PFS and OS (p<0.001). No predictive associations were seen for other BMs tested. Conclusions: The inflammatory cytokine IL6 is highly predictive of therapeutic benefit from BEV when combined with CP. Plasma IL6 may define those EOC pts more or less likely to benefit from the addition of BEV to standard chemotherapy. These data are consistent with previous findings in which IL6 predicted benefit from BEV and pazopanib in renal cell cancer, highlighting the importance of inflammation in ovarian and renal cancers.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 5521)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5521

Abstract #

5521

Poster Bd #

344

Abstract Disclosures