Patient-reported outcomes from randomized, phase-3 study of trabectedin (T) vs. dacarbazine (D) in advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or liposarcoma (LPS).

Authors

George Demetri

George D. Demetri

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

George D. Demetri , Margaret von Mehren , Robin Lewis Jones , Martee Leigh Hensley , Scott Schuetze , Anthony D. Elias , Renee F. Pierson , Roland Elmar Knoblauch , Youn C. Park , George C. Wang , Nushmia Z. Khokhar , Robert G Maki , Shreyaskumar Patel , Charles S. Cleeland

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Raritan, NJ, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: T is recently approved in the US for treatment of advanced LMS or LPS after prior chemotherapy failure based on results from a randomized, phase-3 study (Demetri et al, 2015, J Clin Oncol; 62.4734). Here we describe patient-reported outcomes from this pivotal study, performed at the time of final progression-free survival and overall response rate analyses (interim overall survival analysis). Methods: Patients (pts) completed the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), a 19-item questionnaire that measures symptom severity (SS), and whether symptoms interfere with daily function (Symptom Interference-SI). Pts rated their experience (on 0-10 point scales, where lower scores mean fewer symptoms and less interference) across 13 different symptom measures (SS), and 6 measures of physical and mental function (SI), before treatment on day 1 of each treatment cycle (Cy). Results: Among 495 (T = 340; D = 155) pts randomized and treated, 329 (96.8%) from T group and 150 (96.8%) from D group completed baseline MDASI; compliance at each treatment Cy was high (91.4-100% [T] vs. 92.6-100% [D]). 72 pts on T and 14 on D received at least 8 Cy, and 71 (98.6%) pts (T) and 14 (100%) pts (D) completed questionnaires at Cy 8. Baseline MDASI scores for all measured symptoms were low and comparable across T and D groups (median range: 0-2.0). Pts’ experience with 3 core MDASI items (pain, fatigue, nausea) were representative of other SS measures with comparable mean baselines scores for both groups. Mean changes from baseline to Cy 8 in SS measures were not clinically meaningful for either group. Severe symptoms ( ≥ 7 on 0-10 scale) at baseline were reported most frequently in the pain (T: 15.9%, D:17.3%) and fatigue (T:13.4%, D: 16.7%) scores. The only statistically significant between-group difference was observed for nausea, and only at Cy 2 (9.4% [T] vs. 3.3% [D], p = 0.0396). Conclusions: Pts enrolled on this study had a relatively low baseline symptom burden. Symptom burden, assessed by MDASI, was generally not affected by drug treatment. Comparable side effects between treatment groups coupled with an improvement in efficacy supports T over D. Clinical trial information: NCT01343277

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Soft Tissue Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01343277

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 11061)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.11061

Abstract #

11061

Poster Bd #

187

Abstract Disclosures