Phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalation study of pasireotide LAR (PAS) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

Authors

null

Jonathan R. Strosberg

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Jonathan R. Strosberg , Jennifer A. Chan , Alain C. Mita , Madan Kundu , Sue-zette Valera , Peter Unge , Christelle Darstein , Mike Hu , Edward M. Wolin , James C. Yao

Organizations

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Florham Park, NJ, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Pasireotide, a novel somatostatin analog, has been previously investigated but the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been determined in pts with advanced NET. We report results of a planned interim analysis of a phase I dose-escalation (DE) study to determine the MTD, characterize safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy trends in pts with advanced NET. Methods: Pts were enrolled in 2 phases: DE phase (to determine the MTD) at a starting dose of 80mg PAS i.m. followed by a dose expansion (DX) phase (evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy). Associations between PK parameters and clinical outcomes (probability of bradycardia, % tumor shrinkage, and glucagon levels) were evaluated using regression analysis. Bradycardia is defined as heart rate < 40 bpm. Results: As of July-2015, 29 pts (15, DE; 14, DX) were treated with 80 mg (13pts) and 120 mg (16pts) doses. No protocol defined dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the study; however in a post hoc analysis a higher incidence of bradycardia was seen with 120 mg (31.3%) vs 80 mg (0%). At data cut-off, 92.3% in 80 mg and 75% pts in 120 mg had discontinued treatment; primarily due to disease progression (44.8%) or adverse events (AEs; 27.6%). In the PK analysis, probability of bradycardia showed a moderate increase with increasing PAS concentration that was not statistically significant [Odds ratio for every 1.5x increase (95% CI): daytime, 1.672 (0.381-7.338); nighttime, 2.024 (0.494-8.292)]. No significant association was observed between PAS concentrations and glucagon levels. Two partial radiographic responses (PRs) were observed, both in the 120mg dose. PAS concentrations correlated with % tumor shrinkage although the association was not statistically significant (P= 0.08). The most common AEs in the 80 mg vs 120 mg were hyperglycemia (76.9% vs 81.3%), fatigue (53.8% vs 50%) and nausea (53.8% vs 31.3%). Conclusions: MTD was defined at 120 mg for PAS in pts with advanced NET. Although objective radiographic responses are rarely observed with SSA, 2 PRs were observed among 16 pts in the 120mg cohort. Bradycardia appears to be a dose-limiting effect, however the mechanism and clinical significance are uncertain. Clinical trial information: NCT01364415

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01364415

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 4095)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4095

Abstract #

4095

Poster Bd #

87

Abstract Disclosures