Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel-cisplatin-5fluorouracil (DCF) followed by cisplatin-radiotherapy (CRT) or cetuximab-radiotherapy (CetRT) in patients (pts) with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer (LAUHNC).

Authors

null

Ricardo Hitt

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Las Matas, Spain

Ricardo Hitt , Ricard Mesia Sr., Juan Jose Grau , Lara Iglesias , Elvira Del Barco , Alicia Lozano , Javier Martinez Trufero , Carlos Garcia Giron , Ana Lopez Martin , Juan Jesus Cruz hernandez

Organizations

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Las Matas, Spain, Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Clinic barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Hspital Universitario Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Universitario Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, Hospital de Burgos, Burgos, Spain, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Research Funding

Other

Background: CetRT has not been compared with CRT after ICT in phase III. Objective: To compare the impact on overall survival of CRT vs. CetRT after ICT in a Phase III randomized controlled clinical trial with a non-inferiority design of CetRT compared to CRT. Response Rate (RR), loco-regional control (LRC) and toxicity in both arms were considered secondary objectives. Methods: Pts with LAUHNC, ECOG 0-1, 18-72 years old, measurable disease, and with adequate renal and liver function, received standard DCF with G-CSF. After at least 2 cycles (range 2-3), pts with objective response or stable disease were randomized (stratified by tumor location, 1:1) between cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1, 22, 43) plus radiotherapy (dose 68-72 Gy, in 35 fractions) (arm A) or cetuximab (400mg d1, 250mg/m2 weekly concurrent with RT) plus the same radiotherapy scheme (arm B). Non-inferiority will be assumed if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI of the hazard ratio for OS (CetRT/CRT) is below 1.3. Analyses were done by intention to treat. Results: 530 pts were enrolled and 407 randomized (arm A: 205; arm B: 202). Median age 56 years , 89% male, ECOG 1: 70%, oropharynx and hypopharynx: 64%, T3/T4: 81%, N2/N3: 76%. During ICT the major causes of discontinuation were progressive disease or toxicity (24%). Median number of DCF cycles was 3 (range 0-3). RR during ICT was 71%. Toxicity G3/4 was observed in 40% of pts. After randomization the median number of cisplatin cycles was 3 (range 1-3), median number of cetuximab cycles was 8 (range 1-15) and median dose of radiotherapy was 70Gy (range 62-72 Gy). After CRT and CetRT, RRs were 72% and 78%, respectively. Toxicity (G3/4 RTOG) during CRT and CetRT were 36% and 32%, respectively. With a median follow up of 36 months LRC were 56% in arm A vs. 52% in arm B ( hazard ratio (HR), 1.13; 95% CI , 0.84 to 1.51 ) p value = 0.4 Conclusions: This is the first randomized Phase III trial that compare CRT vs. CetRT after ICT in pts with LAUHNC. The RR, toxicity and LRC were similar in both arms. With a long follow up, data of survival will be present in the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00716391

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00716391

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 6001)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.6001

Abstract #

6001

Abstract Disclosures