Genomic profiling and efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Authors

null

Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli , Garrett Michael Nash , Martin Morris , Jaclyn Frances Hechtman , Efsevia Vakiani , Michael F. Berger , David B. Solit , Leonard Saltz , Andrea Cercek

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Other

Background: Metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AAC) is a heterogenous disease and a large proportion of patients present with diffuse metastases in the peritoneal cavity. Cytotoxic and targeted therapies are typically extrapolated from colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), however, the efficacy is not well studied. Herein we investigated the genetic profiles of these tumors in an effort to identify molecular characteristics and potentially actionable mutations, as well as the response to anti-EGFR therapy in RAS/BRAF wild type (wt) AAC. Methods: We identified patients (pts) with ACC treated at MSKCC from 2002 to 2016 who had undergone molecular profiling, either by next generation sequencing using our MSK-IMPACT platform, or by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy genotyping (Sequenom). MSK-IMPACT tumors and matched normal samples were analyzed on a 410 gene panel. Sequenom provided an 8 gene panel including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA. Via an IRB approved waiver, we collected tumor histology and evaluated those who were RAS/RAF wt and were treated with anti-EGFR therapy. Results: To date, we identified a total 109 AAC patients, of whom 60 had Sequenom testing and 49 had MSK-IMPACT. Among pts analyzed with MSK-IMPACT, 34 had mucinous adenocarcinoma, 6 adenocarcinoma, 9 adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoid. In total 194 alterations were identified with a median 3.9 alterations/patient (range 0-10). Alterations were seen most commonly in KRAS (57%), GNAS (33%), TP53 (29%), and SMAD4 (6%). Potentially treatable alterations were present in 12% of patients and included BRAF V600E (1), MTOR (2), ERBB2 (1) and NTRK(2). Of the total 109 pts, 51 (47%) were RAS/BRAF wt. Of those, 12 evaluable patients received anti-EGFR therapy with either panitumumab or cetuximab. There were no responders. Conclusions: Mutational sequencing in AAC indicates that 12% have mutations in genes such as BRAF V600E, MTOR, ERBB2 and NTRK with the potential to expand investigational options. Additionally, in RAS/BRAF wt pts, panitumumab/cetuximab does not appear to have therapeutic efficacy comparable to historic controls in RAS/RAF wt CRC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Other Colorectal and Anal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 4102)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4102

Abstract #

4102

Poster Bd #

94

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer in an Argentinian population.

First Author: Agustín Barbier

First Author: Tomohiro Takeda

Abstract

2016 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Genomic profiling and efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli