Participation and response assessment of older adults with advanced cancer treated on phase I trials as compared to middle age and AYA patients: An analysis of 1489 patients.

Authors

Ishwaria M. Subbiah

Ishwaria Mohan Subbiah

Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Ishwaria Mohan Subbiah , Chad Tang , Arvind Rao , Gerald Steven Falchook , Vivek Subbiah , Razelle Kurzrock , Daniel D. Karp , David S. Hong

Organizations

Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Denver, CO, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Older adults (aged 65 and above) with advanced cancers are underrepresented in clinical trials particularly early phase clinical trials. To assess their participation and clinical response on phase I treatment, we analyzed the characteristics of such patients treated on phase I trials with an emphasis on comparison b/w middle age and adolescent/young adults (AYA). Methods: In total, 1489 consecutive patients treated on phase I trials b/w Dec 2004-July 2013 were separated into 3 age-based cohorts: AYA (15-39y), middle age (40-64y), elderly (65+y) and analyzed for clinical characteristics and response outcomes per RECIST. The clinical benefit (defined as a response of SD ≥ 6 months, PR, or CR, per RECIST) was determined for each cohort. We calculated the odds ratios of achieving a favorable clinical benefit for the 3 age cohorts, and for elderly and AYA in comparison to the middle age. Results: Of 1489 treated patients, 278 were elderly (18%, median age 68.9y), 220 AYA (15%, median age 32.6y), 991 middle age (67%, median age 53.8y). The median number of prior therapies was 3 in all three age groups and the most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (n = 438, 29%), gynecologic (n = 234, 16%), and thoracic/head/neck (n = 216, 15%). Median time on trial did not vary significantly between the 3 age cohorts (3 months in elderly, 3.5 months in middle age, 3.3 months in AYA). The odds ratio of achieving clinical benefit in elderly vs middle age is 1.10, p 0.19 (two-tailed), p 0.09 (one-tailed). Similarly the odds ratio of achieving clinical benefit in AYA vs middle age is 0.85, p 0.31 (proportions z-test, two tailed), p 0.15 (one-tailed). No significant differences were found in the odds ratio of response between the elderly, AYA and middle age cohorts. Analysis of the incidence of toxicities among the three age cohorts is in progress. Conclusions: Elderly patients accounted for less than 20% of patients on phase I clinical trials but those who participated were just as likely to achieve a clinical benefit as the AYA and middle age patients. Participation in phase I therapy may offer a reasonable therapeutic option for elderly patients with advanced cancers.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Geriatric Oncology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 10049)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.10049

Abstract #

10049

Poster Bd #

37

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Hisashi Hosaka

First Author: Anika Kumar

First Author: Maria Regina Girones Sarrio