Rising financial burden of targeted oral anticancer medications on the Medicare Part D program and its beneficiaries.

Authors

null

Ya-Chen T. Shih

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Ya-Chen T. Shih , Ying Xu , Fabrice Smieliauskas , Lei Liu

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

Other

Background: High costs of oncology drugs have threatened the affordability of cancer care. Previous research using data from privately insured non-elderly cancer patients (pts) showed that both the trends of rising prices at launch and of sustained price increase post-launch were more pronounced among targeted oral anticancer medications (TOAMs) compared to targeted intravenous drugs. This study explored the financial burden of TOAMs on Medicare program and beneficiaries. Methods: Using SEER linked to Medicare Part D, 2007-2012, we determined the list of TOAMs from the NCI’s Targeted Cancer Therapy Fact Sheet and identified TOAM users via the National Drug Code in Part D claims. We calculated cost per pt per month (PPPM) by aggregating costs (gross drug costs and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments) of all TOAM claims divided by the total number of months a pt was treated with any TOAM. Results: The study cohort included 37,117 pts who received TOAM between 2007 and 2012. The top five cancers among TOAM users were lung (33%), myeloma (23%), kidney (8%), liver (7%), and leukemia (7%). While the prescription drugs category of medical care consumer price index (CPI) grew at 3.3% per year in the 2007-2012 duration, gross drug costs of TOAMs increased at 11% per year, reaching $7,704 (median $7,636) PPPM in 2012. Among pts who did not receive subsidies from Medicare or other public insurance, OOP costs exhibited a non-linear pattern (Table), with the dip in 2011 corresponding to the starting year of ‘donut hole’ closing. Gross drug costs PPPM varied widely by medication, ranging from $4,100 to > $11,000 in 2012 (not shown in Table). Conclusions: The growth of TOAM costs in Medicare Part D program outpaced the growth of prescription drug CPI more than threefold. Rising drug costs of TOAMs not only impose a substantial fiscal burden on the Medicare Part D program, but also threaten the financial relief that the Affordable Care Act intended to achieve for pts by gradually closing the donut hole.

YearGross drug costs PPPM
OOP cost PPPM
MeanMedianMeanMedian
2007$4,417$3,494$1,011$770
2008$4,880$4,011$1,057$792
2009$5,369$4,465$1,170$858
2010$6,030$5,216$1,209$882
2011$6,692$6,208$709$494
2012$7,705$7,636$802$644

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Track

Health Services Research and Quality of Care

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 6625)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.6625

Abstract #

6625

Poster Bd #

107

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Max Joseph Bouvette

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Out-of-pocket costs for oral anticancer drugs.

First Author: Nivedita Arora

First Author: Danielle Rodin

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of medically integrated pharmacies on oral anticancer medication prescription abandonment.

First Author: Gury K. Doshi