Duration of the anti-androgen in men undergoing six months of an LHRH agonist and radiation therapy for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer and the risk of death.

Authors

Nina Niu Sanford

Nina Niu Sanford

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA

Nina Niu Sanford , Ming-Hui Chen , Marian J. Loffredo , Andrew A. Renshaw , Philip W. Kantoff , Anthony Victor D'Amico

Organizations

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, Dept. of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Whether adding an anti-androgen (AA) to a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist in the radiotherapeutic management of unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) reduces all cause and PC-specific mortality (ACM and PCSM) risk is unknown. We evaluated whether the extent of AA received impacted the risk of ACM and PCSM within comorbidity subgroups. Methods: Between 1995 and 2001, 206 men with localized unfavorable-risk PC were enrolled on a randomized trial comparing radiation with (N = 102) or without (N = 104) 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Partial AA use (median: 4.2 months) occurred in 29 of the 102 men randomized to ADT due to discontinuation for elevated liver function tests or diarrhea. Cox and Fine and Gray's regressions were used to evaluate the impact of full versus partial AA use on PCSM and ACM risk within comorbidity subgroups adjusting for age and PC prognostic factors. Results: After a median follow-up of 16.62 years, 156 men died, 29 from PC (19%) including 25 (86%) and 4 (14%) PC deaths in the 157 and 49 men with no or minimal versus moderate to severe comorbidity, respectively. In men with moderate to severe comorbidity, an increased ACM risk with full as opposed to partial AA use that approached statistical significance was observed (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-5.41]; P = 0.07); whereas only 1 and no PC deaths occurred in men receiving a partial versus a full AA course respectively. Among men with no or minimal comorbidity, no decrease in ACM (AHR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.49-1.91]; P = 0.92) or PCSM risk (AHR 0.73 [95% CI 0.10-5.46]; P = 0.76) was observed for full versus partial AA use. Conclusions: Increasing AA use by 2 months does not appear to impact survival in men with localized unfavorable-risk PC and no or minimal comorbidity but may shorten survival in men with moderate to severe comorbidity raising concern regarding in whom and for how long the AA should be prescribed. Clinical trial information: NCT00116220

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer–Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00116220

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 5070)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5070

Abstract #

5070

Poster Bd #

327

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Daniel Eidelberg Spratt

First Author: Abdenour Nabid