Phase II study of anastrozole in recurrent estrogen (ER) / progesterone (PR) positive endometrial cancer: The PARAGON trial—ANZGOG 0903.

Authors

null

Linda R. Mileshkin

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Linda R. Mileshkin , Richard J Edmondson , Rachel O'Connell , Katrin Marie Sjoquist , David Cannan , Rema Jyothirmayi , Philip James Beale , Tony Bonaventura , Jeffrey C. Goh , Marcia Hall , Andrew R. Clamp , John A. Green , Rosemary Lord , James Scurry , Michael Friedlander

Organizations

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Maidstone Hospital, Kent, United Kingdom, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool and Wirral, United Kingdom, ANZGOG, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Other

Background: Many endometrial cancers express hormone receptors and may respond to hormonal therapy, but the impact on quality of life (QOL) is unclear. The aim of PARAGON is to investigate anastrozole, in patients (pts) with various ER/PR positive metastatic gynaecological cancers in a series of 7 individual phase 2 studies embedded in a basket protocol, with recruitment to the endometrial sub-group complete. Methods: Investigator initiated single arm, open label trial of anastrozole, 1 mg/d in pts with ER and /or PR positive hormone naive endometrial cancer. Pts were treated until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was clinical benefit (response + stable disease) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QOL) and toxicity. QOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, monthly for the first 3 months and then 3 monthly until PD. The proportion of pts whose score improved by ≥10-points (considered clinically relevant) was calculated for each QLQ-C30 subscale. Linear regression was used to compare the change in scores between pts who achieved a 3-month clinical benefit and those with PD. Results: Clinical benefit rate in 82 evaluable pts at 3 months was 44 % (95% CI:34-55%) with a RECIST partial response in 6 (7%). The median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CR: 2.8-5.4). Median duration of clinical benefit was 5.6 months. Treatment was well tolerated with toxicity as expected. Pts achieving a 3-month clinical benefit were significantly more likely than progressors to achieve clinically significant improvements in several QOL domains by 2 months including: emotional functioning (39 vs 6%:p = 0.002), cognitive functioning (45 vs 19%:p = 0.021), fatigue (47 vs19%:p = 0.015) and global health status (42 vs 9%:p = 0.003). Clinical benefit was associated with significantly improved mean change scores at 2-3 months compared to progressors for these domains as well as for social functioning, financial problems, pain, appetite loss and constipation. Conclusions: 44% of patients with ER/PR positive endometrial cancer derived clinical benefit from anastrozole, associated with a significant improvement in QOL. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12610000796088.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Uterine Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ACTRN12610000796088

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 5520)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.5520

Abstract #

5520

Poster Bd #

343

Abstract Disclosures