Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the Prosigna assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in women with early stage breast cancer: which patients are the best candidates?

Authors

null

Roman Rouzier

Insitut Curie, Paris, France

Roman Rouzier , David Gentien , Jean Marc Guinebretiere , Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier , Coraline Dubot , Paul H. Cottu , Sonia Zilberman , Helene Berseneff , Cyril Foa , Remy Salmon , Myriam Delomenie , Diane De Croze , Aurelie Roulot , Amandine Bonhomme , Anne Vincent- Salomon , Anne Cayre , Celine Callens , Frederique Madeleine Penault-Llorca , Delphine Hequet , Cyrille Huchon

Organizations

Insitut Curie, Paris, France, Institut Curie, Paris, France, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, AB, France, Centre Jean Perrin, ERTICa EA 4677, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Hôpital René Huguenin/Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France, APHP Tenon, Gynaecology Dept, Paris, France, CH René-Dubos, Pontoise, France, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France, Hôpital privé des Peupliers, Paris, France, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Centre Jean Perrin/ERTICa EA 4677, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Prosigna is a standardized test measuring expression levels of 50 classifier genes (PAM50) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tumor tissue using nCounter Technology (NanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA). It provides intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence (ROR) score predicting 10y recurrence probability. This Decision Impact study examines whether the Prosigna test influences adjuvant treatment decision beyond immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Methods: The analytic sample was comprised of postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer (EBC) women with estrogen-receptor positive, HER2 negative, pT1-T2 pN0/pN1mi tumors. FFPE surgical specimens were centrally analyzed using Prosigna to classify patients according to the intrinsic tumor subtype and ROR score. The primary endpoint was the effect of the Prosigna test on oncologists’ adjuvant treatment recommendations, and the actual treatment received by patients. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of tumor and patient characteristics that are associated with treatment modification. Results: A total of 205 patients met eligibility criteria and were enrolled in 8 centers between March 2015 and January 2016: 59% of tumors were classified by PAM50 as Luminal A, 39% as Luminal B, 1% Basal, .5% HER2. Clinicians, using local IHC, classified 15% of PAM50 Luminal A as Luminal B, and 40% PAM50 Luminal B as luminal A (overall 27% discordance). Prosigna results led to a reported change in chemotherapy indication in 17% overall (23% according to the French guidelines). Grade 1-2 tumors with progesterone receptor expression less than 20% or Ki67 between 10 and 20% were significantly associated with modification of adjuvant treatment (p < .001). Conclusions: In this prospective Decision Impact study, Prosigna results led to a 17% change in chemotherapy indication. The 27% discordance in intrinsic subtyping between PAM50 and IHC underlines the importance of molecular testing for optimal systemic therapy indications in EBC, particularly fot grade 1-2 tumors with progesterone receptor expression less than 20% or Ki67 between 10 and 20%. Clinical trial information: NCT02395575

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02395575

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 543)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.543

Abstract #

543

Poster Bd #

31

Abstract Disclosures