Short, full-dose adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in high-risk adult soft tissue sarcomas (STS): Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial from the Italian Sarcoma Group and the Spanish Sarcoma Group.

Authors

null

Elena Palassini

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Elena Palassini , Stefano Ferrari , Javier Martin Broto , Paolo Verderio , Antonio Lopez-Pousa , Angela Buonadonna , Rosalba Miceli , Silvia Stacchiotti , Angelo Paolo Dei Tos , Antonino De Paoli , Davide Maria Donati , Andres Poveda , Vittorio Quagliuolo , Alessandro Comandone , Stefano Bottelli , Piero Picci , Paolo Giovanni Casali , Alessandro Gronchi

Organizations

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Aviano, Italy, Azienda ULSS 9 Treviso, Treviso, Italy, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Pordenone, Italy, Clinical Area Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milano, Italy, Ospedale Gradenigo, Pianezza, Italy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, BO, Italy

Research Funding

Other

Background: From 2002 to 2007, we carried out a multicentric Italian/Spanish Phase 3 trial comparing 3 vs 5 cycles of adjuvant CT with full-dose epirubicin + ifosfamide in high-risk STS. A previous Italian randomized study had demonstrated a survival benefit with 5 cycles of the same CT vs nil (JCO 2001;19:1238). The results of this trial were reported (JCO 2012;30:850), with no difference between the two arms in terms of OS and RFS, at a median follow-up (FU) of 5 years. We herein update these results with a longer FU. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive 3 preoperative cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 9 g/m2 (Arm A) or to receive the same 3 preoperative cycles plus 2 postoperative cycles (Arm B). Radiotherapy (RT) could be either delivered in the preoperative or in the postoperative setting. Non-inferiority of the primary endpoint, OS, was assessed by the confidence interval (CI) of the hazard ratio (HR; Arm A/Arm B) derived from Cox model. Results: Between January 2002 and April 2007, 160 pts were assigned to arm A and 161 to arm B. 158 patients received preoperative RT (77 in Arm A and 81 in Arm B). At a median FU of 116 months (IQ range 102-130 months), 123 deaths were recorded: 58 in Arm A and 65 in Arm B. Ten-year OS was 61% for the entire group of patients: 64% in Arm A and 59% in Arm B. The intention-to-treat analysis confirmed that 3 cycles were not inferior to 5 cycles (one-sided 95% upper confidence limit was 1.24). A per-protocol analysis confirmed these results. Distant metastases (DM) were observed in 114 patients, 57 in Arm A and 57 in Arm B. The 10-year crude cumulative incidence of DM from surgery was 34.5%, 34.1% in Arm A and 34.8% in Arm B. Conclusions: The updated results of this trial at a longer FU confirm the non inferiority of 3 cycles of a full-dose conventional CT in comparison to 5, with about 60% patients alive and disease-free in both arms at 10 years. This regimen is currently tested prospectively within an ongoing international trial against 3 cycles of a neoadjuvant histology-tailored CT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01710176). Clinical trial information: EudraCT 2004-003979-36.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Soft Tissue Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

EudraCT 2004-003979-36

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 11045)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.11045

Abstract #

11045

Poster Bd #

171

Abstract Disclosures