Phase III study of intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus s-1/paclitaxel compared with s-1/cisplatin in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: PHOENIX-GC trial.

Authors

null

Hironori Ishigami

The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Hironori Ishigami , Yoshiyuki Fujiwara , Ryoji Fukushima , Atsushi Nashimoto , Hiroshi Yabusaki , Haruhiko Imamoto , Motohiro Imano , Yasuhiro Kodera , Yoshikazu Uenosono , Kenji Amagai , Shigenori Kadowaki , Hiroto Miwa , Takuhiro Yamaguchi , Hironori Yamaguchi , Toshiaki Watanabe , Joji Kitayama

Organizations

The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, Osaka, Japan, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan, Nanbugo General Hospital, Niigata, Japan, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan, Nagoya University, Aichi, Japan, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel (PTX) provides sustained high local concentrations, and its efficacy has been shown in ovarian cancer. We developed a regimen combining IP PTX with S-1/PTX for the treatment of gastric cancer patients, and obtained promising results with a one-year overall survival (OS) rate of 78% in a phase II study. This multicenter phase III study evaluated the efficacy of IP PTX plus S-1/PTX compared to standard systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Eligibility criteria included pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, peritoneal metastasis, and no or short-term (< 2 months) prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to an IP (IP PTX plus S-1/PTX; IP PTX 20 mg/m2, intravenous [IV] PTX 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1-14, q3 weeks) arm or a SP (S-1/cisplatin; IV cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8, and S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1-21, q5 weeks) arm. Randomization was stratified by center, having received prior chemotherapy, and the extent of peritoneal disease. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were response rate and safety. Results: Between October 2011 and November 2013, 183 patients were enrolled, and 164 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Baseline patient characteristics were balanced between the two arms except for ascites. Of 45 patients with massive ascites (beyond the pelvic cavity), 38 (84%) were randomized to the IP arm and 7 (16%) to the SP arm. The median OS for IP and SP were 17.7 and 15.2 months, respectively (stratified log-rank test, p = 0.080; hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.04, p = 0.081). For a sensitivity analysis using a stratified Cox regression model, adjusting for the baseline ascites, the HR was 0.59 (95%CI 0.39-0.87, p = 0.0079). The overall response rate was 53% in the IP arm, and 60% in the SP arm (p = 1.0). Both regimens were tolerable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The primary analysis did not show the statistical superiority of the IP regimen. The sensitivity analysis, considering the imbalance of ascites, suggested clinical efficacy of IP PTX in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Clinical trial information: UMIN000005930.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000005930

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 4014)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4014

Abstract #

4014

Poster Bd #

6

Abstract Disclosures