Immune-related genes to predict clinical outcome of cetuximab (cet) treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Immuno-Oncology assay research.

Authors

Yu Sunakawa

Yu Sunakawa

Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Yu Sunakawa , Eva Wang , Chris Roberts , Dongyun Yang , Qian Liu , Debrah Thompson , Ihab Botros , Miriana Moran , Stephanie H. Astrow , Jack Hsiang , Wu Zhang , Akihito Tsuji , Tadamichi Denda , Ken Shimada , Mitsugu Kochi , Masahiro Takeuchi , Masashi Fujii , Toshifusa Nakajima , Wataru Ichikawa , Heinz-Josef Lenz

Organizations

Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., Tucson, AZ, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Cancer Genetics, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, Kite Pharma Inc, Santa Monica, CA, Department of Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan, Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Clinical Medicine, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan, Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization, Tokyo, Japan, Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: CRC Subtyping Consortium identified 4 molecular subtypes, one of which was classified by factors including activation or expression of immune-related pathways (Guinney J, et al. Nat med 2015). The antitumor activity of cet requires antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) driven by natural killer (NK) cells. Strategies to amplify the NK cell activation may improve the efficacy of cet (Kohrt HE, et al. J Clin Invest 2014), suggesting the ADCC activity may be affected by extracellular immune mechanisms. We therefore investigated whether immune-related genes will predict outcome in mCRC patients (pts) treated with cet. Methods: We measured expression levels of 354 immune-related genes implicated in the host immune response to tumors by HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel, which comprises 2560 gene probes, using next generation sequencing for quantitative analysis of targeted RNAs. Total RNA isolated from tissues of 77 KRAS wild-type pts (57% males, median age of 63 years, 90% of performance status 0, and 15% right-colon cancer) enrolled in 2 phase II trials (JACCRO CC-05:UMIN000004197 or CC-06:UMIN000007022) of 1st-line therapy with FOLFOX or SOX plus cet was analyzed. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed for all genes that passed QC filtering. Hierarchical clustering was performed using genes under 0.01 of the Cox p-value. Results: In progression-free survival, the clustering using 2 significant genes, RIPK1 and CEACAM5, could divide all participants into 2 groups and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve had a significant difference (mean 3.2 vs. 11.7 months, p= 7.61e-08). In overall survival (OS), 2 groups were classified based on the clustering using 7 genes and the KM curves were significantly different (mean 10.8 vs. 26.0 months, p= 5.79e-06). The Cox regression analysis revealed that IRF3 and BMP4 had strong associations with OS (p= 6.02×10-4, adjusted FDR.p= 0.043 and p= 8.69×10-4, FDR.p= 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that immune-related genes may identify subtypes associated with clinical outcome of 1st-line cet treatment for mCRC. Further studies to validate the findings are warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Tumor Biology

Track

Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Tumor-Based Biomarkers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 11591)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.11591

Abstract #

11591

Poster Bd #

288

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts