Phase 3 study of first-line crizotinib vs pemetrexed−cisplatin/carboplatin (PCC) in East Asian patients (pts) with ALK+ advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors

null

Shun Lu

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Shun Lu , Tony Mok , You Lu , Jianying Zhou , Yuankai Shi , Virote Sriuranpong , James C. M. Ho , Choo Khoon Ong , Chun-Ming Tsai , Chin-Hee Chung , Keith D. Wilner , Yiyun Tang , Elizabeth Masters , Paulina Selaru , Yi-Long Wu

Organizations

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China, West China Hospital, West China School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu, China, Respiratory Department, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, Hospital Pulau Pinang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Pfizer Oncology, New York, NY, Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The phase 3 study PROFILE 1014 showed a superior outcome of crizotinib over PCC in ALK+ NSCLC. A phase 3 study of similar design (ongoing; NCT01639001) was conducted in an East Asian population in China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Thailand. Methods: The study was designed to detect an improvement in median PFS from 6.4 to 10 mo with 80% power and 1-sided type I error of 0.025. Between Sep 2012 and Jul 2014, 207 pts with previously untreated ALK+ advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 (stratification: ECOG PS 0/1 vs 2) to receive crizotinib 250 mg PO BID (n = 104) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 with either cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5–6, IV q3w for ≤ 6 cycles (n = 103). Continuation of/crossover to crizotinib after PD (per independent radiological review) was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS; key secondary endpoints were ORR, OS, safety, and PROs. Results: In the crizotinib and PCC arms, respectively, 91% and 93% were Han Chinese, 95% and 95% had ECOG PS 0/1, and 20% and 31% had brain metastases. The study met its primary objective: crizotinib significantly prolonged PFS vs PCC (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29–0.57; 1-sided P < 0.0001; median 11.1 and 6.8 mo). The ORR was significantly higher with crizotinib (87.5% vs 45.6%; 2-sided P < 0.0001). At data cutoff, 82 pts (80%) on PCC had crossed over to crizotinib and 59% of pts (122/207) remained in follow-up. With only 35% of OS events, there was a numerical (not statistically significant) improvement in OS with crizotinib (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.56–1.45; 1-sided P = 0.33). Crizotinib and PCC safety profiles were consistent with those previously published. The most common all-causality AEs with crizotinib were elevated transaminases (69%), diarrhea (59%), and vision disorder (56%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (16%) and elevated transaminases (12%). Two grade 5 AEs (death of unknown cause, interstitial lung disease) were considered crizotinib-related. Conclusions: These results confirm the findings from PROFILE 1014 and demonstrate that first-line crizotinib significantly improves PFS and ORR vs PCC in an East Asian population with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01639001

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01639001

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 9058)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9058

Abstract #

9058

Poster Bd #

381

Abstract Disclosures