Simplified CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype categorization of patients treated with tamoxifen: Role for endoxifen level monitoring?

Authors

null

Clara Inkyung Lee

Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Clara Inkyung Lee , Amanda Siew Kee Low , Peter Fox , Bavanthi Balakrishnar , Rosemary L Balleine , Bo Gao , Pamela Provan , Sally Coulter , Christopher Liddle , Rina Hui , Nicholas Wilcken , Mark Wong , Howard Gurney

Organizations

Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Annandale, Australia, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia, Sydney West Cancer Network, Westmead Millennium Institute, Sydney Medical School-Westmead, Sydney, Australia, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Westmead Millennium Institute, Sydney, Australia, Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Westmead Cancer Care Center, Westmead, Australia, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia

Research Funding

Other

Background: Classifications for CYP2D6 phenotypes are established for debrisoquine, sparteine and codeine, but not for tamoxifen. CYP2D6 protein activity can be inferred from the ratio of N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDMT) to endoxifen (EDF). CYP2D6polymorphisms are common and can affect CYP2D6 protein activity and EDF level. Retrospective analyses of two breast cancer studies indicate that EDF levels below 15nM may relate to worse outcome. Methods: A target NDMT/EDF ratio was defined as that which was associated with an EDF level of 15nM in 108 Australian tamoxifen-treated patients (pts), dichotomizing the group into ‘Normal’ (NM) and ‘Slow’ CYP2D6 metabolizer groups (SM). Pts were classified according to genotype based on Crews et al Clin Pharmacol Ther 95, 376, 2014 (ultrarapid/extensive, intermediate or poor metabolizers; UM/EM, IM, PM) or a simplified system based on whether anyvariant allele was present. The following alleles were measured: *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *8, *9, *10, *14, *17, *39, *41, 1N and 2N on germline DNA. Concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use was excluded. Results: A target NDMT/EDF ratio of 44 correlated with 15nM EDF level and dichotomized pts into NM (<44; N =90) and SM (>44; N= 18) groups. Association between classification systems and slow metabolizer status is shown in table below. Conclusions: If validated, this simple classification system may be superior to standard systems for predicating slow CYP2D6 metabolism. However, a significant proportion of v/v patients (26%) had normal CYP2D6 activity indicating that CYP2D6 genotype may be a poor measure of protein activity and that direct measurement of endoxifen should be considered.

Current genotype classification
Simplified classification
UM/EM
N = 91
IM
N = 9
PM
N = 8
wt/wt
N = 44
wt/v
N = 41
v/v
N = 23
Slow metabolizer
(NDMT/EDF > 44)
N = 18
5/91 (5%)5/9 (56%)8/8 (100%)0/44
(0%)
1/41 (2%)17/23 (74%)
Sensitivity44.4%94.4%
Specificity100%93.3%
Sensitivity72.2%
Specificity95.6%

v/v pts were further examined but no single allele predicted for SM with many alleles occurring in both SM and NM pts.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 536)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.536

Abstract #

536

Poster Bd #

24

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts