Nivolumab (NIVO) safety in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) who have progressed on or after ipilimumab (IPI): a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study (CheckMate 172).

Authors

Paolo Antonio Ascierto

Paolo Antonio Ascierto

Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy

Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Lev V. Demidov , Claus Garbe , Paul Lorigan , Helen Gogas , Christoph Hoeller , John B. A. G. Haanen , Enrique Espinosa , Tormod Kyrre Guren , Eva Muñoz-Couselo , Andree Rorive , Piotr Rutkowski , Reinhard Dummer , Ana Carneiro , Geke Hospers , Frank Hermann , Joel Jiang , Dirk Schadendorf , Paul D. Nathan

Organizations

Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy, NN Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain, CHU Sart Tilman Liège, Liege, Belgium, Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Lund University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: NIVO, a programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy in MEL patients (pts) who progressed after IPI in the phase III CheckMate 037 trial (Lancet Oncol 2015;16:375). We assessed NIVO monotherapy in pts with MEL who had progressed on or after IPI, including pts with poor prognostic factors who have been largely excluded from clinical trials (eg, ECOG performance status [PS] 2, brain metastases). Methods: In this ongoing phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study, European pts with MEL who progressed on or after IPI are treated with NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W for up to 2 years until progression or unacceptable toxicity (NCT02156804). The primary endpoint is safety; secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR). We report safety in the first 307 treated pts (database lock, November 2015; minimum follow-up of 6 months). Results: At baseline, 8% of pts had ECOG PS 2, 65% had M1c disease, 15% had a history of brain metastases, and 29% had received ≥ 3 prior therapies. Overall, 256 (84%) patients received at least 4 doses of NIVO, while 241 (79%) received > 4 doses. The incidence of treatment-related any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were 58% and 11%, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs occurred in 3% of pts. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The most common treatment-related select AEs (ie, potentially immune-related) were dermatologic (19%), endocrine (9%), gastrointestinal (7%), and hepatic (5%). ORR data are planned to be available for the presentation. Conclusions: CheckMate 172 represents the largest study of NIVO safety and efficacy in pts with MEL who progressed on or after IPI. In this initial report, NIVO demonstrated a safety profile consistent with previously reported clinical trial data. Clinical trial information: NCT02156804

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02156804

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 9526)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9526

Abstract #

9526

Poster Bd #

131

Abstract Disclosures