Androgen receptor (AR) expression in primary breast cancer (BC): Correlations with clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Authors

null

Neelima Vidula

UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Neelima Vidula , Christina Yau , Denise M Wolf , Hope S. Rugo

Organizations

UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato, CA, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Other

Background: AR is expressed in BC and may be a discrete subtype of triple negative (TN) BC. Recent trials showed modest efficacy of AR antagonists in AR+ TNBC. We investigated associations between primary BC AR gene expression (ARe), clinical characteristics, and outcomes in publically available databases. Methods: ARe was evaluated with microarray data from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 1 study (n = 149). Associations with clinical features and chemotherapy response were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and recurrence free survival (RFS) by the Cox proportional hazard model. Pearson correlations between AR and selected genes were determined in I-SPY 1, METABRIC (n = 1992), and TCGA (n = 817). Results: In I-SPY1, ARe was lower in TN than hormone receptor+/HER2- and HER2+ BC (p < 0.0001). ARe was lower in basal BC (p < 0.0001) and was higher in patients > age 50 (p = 0.05). ARe correlated with grade I/II histology (p < 0.0001) and node negativity at diagnosis (p = 0.0058) but not with stage, lymphovascular invasion, or pathologic complete response. Higher ARe remained associated with better RFS upon adjustment for receptor subtype (p = 0.01). Table 1 below shows genes with significant (p < 0.05) correlations with AR in ≥ 2 datasets. Conclusions: ARe is lowest in TN and basal BC. Consistent with this finding, AR correlates with luminal genes FOXA1, ESR1, MUC1, and inversely with basal genes MYC, CRYAB, EGFR, DNA damage repair genes, mesenchymal genes KIT and CDK 6, and immune genes PD-1 and STAT5A. ARe appears to provide independent prognostic information when receptor subtypes were considered.

ISPY-1
(n = 149)
METABRIC
(n = 1992)
METABRIC TN
(n = 320)
TCGA
(n = 817)
TCGA TN
(n = 101)
POSITIVE Correlations (r)
FOXA10.740.660.730.760.62
    ESR10.560.500.230.630.40
    MUC10.360.440.340.330.26
ERBB20.370.210.340.270.35
TNSF100.290.210.220.26NS
INVERSE Correlations (r)
MYC-0.46-0.31-0.41-0.29-0.24
    CRYAB-0.18-0.40-0.32-0.45-0.30
    EGFR-0.35-0.26NS-0.22NS
CDK 6-0.53-0.48-0.29-0.31NS
    KITNS-0.28-0.28-0.12NS
PD-1NS-0.20NS-0.28NS
    STAT5ANS-0.15NS-0.077NS
PARPi-7 (DNA damage repair deficiency signature)N/A-0.21-0.16-0.42-0.22

NS: non-significant

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 1072)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.1072

Abstract #

1072

Poster Bd #

177

Abstract Disclosures