A phase I study of afatinib combined with carboplatin or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

Authors

null

Fangfei Gao

Kings College London, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Fangfei Gao , Mary O'Brien , Debashis Sarker , Jaishree Bhosle , Timothy Anthony Yap , Martina Maria Uttenreuther-Fischer , Karine Pemberton , Rainer-Georg Goeldner , Sabrina Wiebe , Johann S. De Bono , Johann de Bono , James F. Spicer

Organizations

Kings College London, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib, has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and promising efficacy when combined with cytotoxic agents. Methods: In an open-label, 3+3 dose escalation study, we evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of afatinib in combination with carboplatin (regimen A) or carboplatin + paclitaxel (regimen B). The starting dose was afatinib 20 mg/day + carboplatin AUC6 (Day 1 of a 3-weekly cycle) in both regimens. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 was given on Day 1 of each cycle in regimen B. Carboplatin was reduced to AUC5 in case of toxicity. Afatinib was to be escalated from 20 to 40 mg then 50 mg; if ≥2/6 pts experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 40 mg, an intermediate dose of 30 mg was assessed. Results: 12 pts were treated in regimen A (8 male; median age 58 years) and 26 in regimen B (13 male; median age 61 years). The table shows dose cohorts and DLTs in both regimens. Although MTD was not reached for regimen A, it was decided not to escalate the dose further. Overall, the most frequent (any grade) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were rash/acne (75%), fatigue (67%) and diarrhea (58%) in regimen A and diarrhea (88%), rash/acne (73%) and fatigue (69%) in regimen B. Afatinib did not appear to alter carboplatin or paclitaxel PK. Partial response was reported in 3 pts (25%) in regimen A and 5 (19%) in regimen B. Conclusions: MTD was not reached for regimen A but the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was afatinib 40 mg + carboplatin AUC6. MTD/RP2D for regimen B was afatinib 20 mg + carboplatin AUC5 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2. At RP2D, AEs were manageable with antitumor activity observed. Clinical trial information: NCT00809133

Afatinib
(mg/day)
Paclitaxel (mg/m2)/ carboplatin (AUC)All pts/
evaluable pts/
pts with DLT
DLT (all G3)
Regimen
A
20-/63/3/0
40-/69/6/1Dermatitis acneiform
Regimen
B
20175/67/6/2Fatigue/C. difficile infection/diarrhea/ small intestinal
hemorrhage/ dehydration/renal impairment/neutropenic
sepsis;
Mucosal inflammation
20175/56/6/0*
40175/55/5/2Febrile neutropenia;
Fatigue/mucosal inflammation
30175/58/6/2Stomatitis;
Mucosal inflammation

* No DLT in first 3 pts; cohort expanded to 6 pts after 40 and 30 mg dose exceeded MTD.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Small Molecules

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00809133

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 2571)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2571

Abstract #

2571

Poster Bd #

271

Abstract Disclosures