KRAS and BRAF as prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Francesco Passiglia

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Francesco Passiglia , Giuseppe Bronte , Antonio Galvano , Sergio Rizzo , Angela Listì , Nadia Barraco , Lavinia Insalaco , Rossella Maragliano , Enrico Bronte , Emmanuela Musso , Aurelia Guarini , Luisa Castellana , Marta Castiglia , Valentina Calò , Salvatore Vieni , Giuseppe Cicero , Christian Diego Rolfo , Viviana Bazan , Antonio Russo

Organizations

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 1.Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 1. Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, Phase I – Early Clinical Trials Unit, Oncology Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

Research Funding

Other

Background: Clinical trials investigated the potential role of both KRAS and BRAF mutations, as prognostic biomarkers, in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent surgical treatment of liver metastasis (CLM), showing conflicting results. This meta-analysis aims to review all the studies reporting survival outcomes (recurrence free survival (RFS), and/or overall survival (OS)) of patients undergoing resection of CLM, stratified according to KRAS and/or BRAF mutation status. Methods: Data from all published studies reporting survival outcomes (RFS and/or OS) of CRC patients who received resection of CLM, stratified by KRAS and/or BRAF mutation status were collected by searching in PubMed, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting proceedings. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for both the OS and/or RFS. Results: Seven eligible trials (1403 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed that KRAS mutations predicted a significant worse both RFS (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.23 – 2.21) and OS (HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.51 – 2.30) in patients who underwent surgical resection of CLM. BRAF mutations were also associated with a significant worse OS (HR: 3.90; 95% CI: 1.96 – 7.73) in this subgroup of patients. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests both KRAS and BRAF mutations as negative prognostic biomarkers associated with worse survival outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection of CLM. Such evidences support the introduction of new treatment decision models, taking into account the tumor molecular profile in order to individualize both systemic and loco-regional treatment strategies.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3565)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3565

Abstract #

3565

Poster Bd #

262

Abstract Disclosures