A phase I study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors

null

May Thet Cho

City of Hope, Duarte, CA

May Thet Cho , Dean Lim , Timothy W. Synold , Paul Henry Frankel , Lucille A. Leong , Joseph Chao , Vincent M. Chung , Yuan Chen , Stephen Sentovich , Eloise Luevanos , Marwan Fakih

Organizations

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, City of Hope, Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Pre-clinical studies have shown that the combination of MEK inhibitors and 5-FU improves antitumor activity and that MEK inhibition overcomes both 5FU and platinum resistance. This phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination MEK162 and FOLFOX. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed or failed prior 5FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin and/or anti-EGFR therapy received twice daily MEK162 continuously or intermittently in combination with every-2-week FOLFOX without bolus 5-FU. Two dose levels of MEK162 (30mg and 45mg) were investigated in a standard 3 + 3 escalation design. Limited pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of 5FU and oxaliplatin was performed at the MTD. An additional 6-patient expansion cohort of MEK162, a the defined MTD, was given BID on D1-D5 followed by FOLFOX on Day 6, repeated every 2 weeks. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any treatment-related grade (G) 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity (with the exception of G3 diarrhea or vomiting < 48 hrs) or G 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia within the first 2 cycles (4 weeks) of the treatment. Results: 16 pts were enrolled in the continuous MEK162 arm (median age (range) 53 yrs (49-78); 11 men; ECOG 0/1 in 9/7 patients). No DLT was noted on the study. The MTD of MEK162 was 45 mg PO BID. An additional 6 pts (for a total of 12) were enrolled at the MTD for PK analysis and none of them developed DLT defining toxicities. A median of 8 cycles (range 1-19) was administered. Treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicities included anaphylaxis due to oxaliplatin (n = 1), CPK elevation (n = 2), neutropenia (n = 1), peripheral neuropathy (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), retinal vascular disorder (n = 1), and acneiform rash (n = 1). 10 pts had SD at 2 months (m) by radiographic assessment, 5 of whom with stabilizations of > 4 m (4-10 m). There were no significant differences in either 5-FU or oxaliplatin PK's with or without MEK162. None of the intermittent MEK162 pts developed a DLT and all 6 progressed at 2 m. Conclusions: The combination of continuous MEK162 and FOLFOX has a manageable toxicity profile and promising antitumor activity in heavily pretreated mCRC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02041481

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Other Novel Agents

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02041481

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 2544)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2544

Abstract #

2544

Poster Bd #

244

Abstract Disclosures