Predictive value of KRAS mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with capecitabine and bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment vs observation in the phase III CAIRO3 study.

Authors

null

Kaitlyn K.H. Goey

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

Kaitlyn K.H. Goey , Sjoerd G. Elias , Harm van Tinteren , Miangela M. Lacle , Stefan M. Willems , Wendy W.J. de Leng , Eric Strengman , Celien Vreuls , Geert-Jan Creemers , Ankie Van Der Velden , Cornelis J. A. Punt , Miriam Koopman

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Pathology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: The impact of KRAS mutation status in mCRC treated with anti-VEGF therapy is controversial. The randomized phase 3 CAIRO3 study showed benefit of first-line CAP-B maintenance treatment compared to observation in mCRC patients (pts) with stable disease or better after 6 cycles CAPOX-B. We investigated the predictive value of KRAS mutation status within the CAIRO3 study. Methods: We extracted tumor DNA from paraffin blocks and used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to detect mutations in KRAS exon 2-4. We supplemented this with KRAS data collected from local laboratories. We used stratified Cox regression models adjusted for baseline covariables to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and to analyze whether treatment effect was modified by KRAS mutation status. Time to first progression (PFS1), time to second progression after CAPOX-B reintroduction (PFS2, primary endpoint), time to second progression on any treatment (TT2PD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results:KRAS mutation status was available from 448/557 pts (80%), determined by NGS (n = 317) or already available data (n = 131). Tumors were KRAS wild-type (wt) in 240 (54%) and mutant (mt) in 208 (46%) pts. Pts with KRAS wt tumors had significantly more benefit from CAP-B maintenance treatment compared to observation than pts with KRAS mt tumors for all endpoints, except for PFS1. Pts with KRASmt tumors showed significant benefit from maintenance treatment only in PFS1 and PFS2 (Table). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in the first-line treatment of mCRC, pts with KRAS wt tumors benefit most from CAP-B maintenance treatment compared to observation after 6 cycles CAPOX-B. We are currently analyzing the predictive value of RAS, BRAF and mismatch repair status. Clinical trial information: NCT00442637

HR (95% CI) for maintenance vs observation
Pinteraction
KRASwtKRASmt
PFS10.27 (0.20 - 0.37)0.40 (0.29 - 0.55).07
PFS20.45 (0.34 - 0.61)0.72 (0.53 - 0.98).03
TT2PD0.42 (0.31 - 0.57)0.75 (0.55 - 1.03).008
OS0.64 (0.47 - 0.87)1.07 (0.77 - 1.48).02

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00442637

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3525)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3525

Abstract #

3525

Poster Bd #

222

Abstract Disclosures