Impact of a best practice alert on transfusion practices for solid tumor oncology patients.

Authors

null

Ryan Buck

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Chicago, IL

Ryan Buck, Kelley Wachsberg, Charlotta Weaver, Lyndsey Dombrowski, Madeleine Ma, Jungwha Lee, Kevin O'Leary

Organizations

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Recent evidence supports a restrictive transfusion strategy in the majority of hospitalized patients, though transfusion practices for oncology patients remain highly variable. We evaluated whether use of a best practice alert for solid tumor oncology inpatients would result in more restrictive transfusion practices and impact patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, historical control analysis at a large academic hospital in Chicago, IL. We compared transfusion utilization among solid tumor oncology patients before and after implementation of a transfusion alert. Patients with active bleeding, hematologic malignancies and those undergoing surgical procedures were excluded. A best practice alert with clinical decision support encouraging use of a restrictive transfusion strategy (Hgb < 7 g/dL) was implemented 6/14 with phase-in completed by 9/14. We abstracted PRE intervention medical records of patients hospitalized from 5/1/13 to 4/30/14 and POST intervention records from 9/1/14 to 8/31/15. Readmission rates, incidence of ICU transfer and inpatient mortality were also compared using multiple linear regression. Outcomes were adjusted for age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status and Charlson comorbidity index. Results: 1296 total patients were included in the analysis (PRE, n = 685; POST, n = 611). There were no differences in age, gender, BMI or Charlson comorbidity index among cohorts, although the PRE cohort included more Caucasians (60.2% vs. 46.8%, p < 0.0001) and smokers (6.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.002). Packed red blood cells transfused per 100 patient-days were significantly lower in the POST-intervention cohort (3.8 vs. 6.4, p = 0.01). The POST-intervention cohort also had fewer 30-day emergency department visits (3.3% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in rates of 30-day readmission (34.6 % vs. 37.3%, p = 0.19), ICU transfer (0.5% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.08) or inpatient mortality (1.7% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.96). Conclusions: Implementation of a best practice alert among solid tumor oncology patients effectively reduced utilization of packed red blood cells without affecting patient outcomes.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Science of Quality

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality,Practice of Quality,Science of Quality

Sub Track

Learning from Projects Done in a Health System

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 7S; abstr 57)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.57

Abstract #

57

Poster Bd #

A3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Antonio Giuseppe Faieta

First Author: Ayobami Gbenga Olafimihan

First Author: Mae Alghawas

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Reducing oncology readmissions through a multidisciplinary discharge approach.

First Author: Samantha DiBenedetto