Possible role of the systemic inflammatory reaction in defining tumor responder vs. nonresponder in cancer macrobead therapy.

Authors

null

Barry H. Smith

The Rogosin Institute, New York, NY

Barry H. Smith , Zoe Padua Andrada , Angelica Nazarian , Allyson J. Ocean , Tapan Parikh , Jia Lu , Anna Arreglado , Thomas J. Fahey III, Nathaniel Berman , Larry Gazda , Prithy Martis , Melissa Laramore , Eugene Akahoho , Joanne Thomas , David J. Wolf

Organizations

The Rogosin Institute, New York, NY, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, The Rogosin Institute Xenia Division, Xenia, OH

Research Funding

Other

Background: Peritoneal implantation of mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell-containing (RENCA) Macrobead (MB) represents a cell-system-based approach to the treatment of advanced, mCRC that has been evaluated to date in Phase IIa trials. The data indicate that there are “responders” (R) and “non-responders”(NR) as reflected in overall survival (OS), where “response” is defined as a >20% decrease in either/both CEA or CA19-9 during the first 30 days after MB implantation. We analyzed whether the “response” is due to a post-implant systemic inflammatory response (SIR) or rather a direct inhibitory effect of the MB. Methods: Thirty-four treatment-resistant mCRC patients (pts) were implanted laparoscopically at least once with RENCA MB. Pts were considered R (n=25), or NR (n=9), based on tumor marker responses within the first 30 days. CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and ESR, as measures of SIR, were measured at Day 14 and 30. Results: All 34 pts showed SIR to MB implantation, as indicated by transient rises in CRP, IL-6, TNF-a, and ESR. Baseline CRP values (R, mean 3.24+/-4.39 vs. NR, 2.96+/-3.43; t-test, p=0.86), Day 14 CRP values (R, mean 20.97 +/- 7.21 vs. NR, 14.5+/-8.78; t-test, p=0.04), Day 30 CRP values (R, mean 8.21+/-5.43 vs. NR, 10.76+/-6.92; t-test, p=0.27) and mean changes in IL-6 (baseline p=0.28; Day 14 p=0.36; Day 30 p=0.54), TNF-a (baseline p=0.37; Day 14 p=0.32; Day 30 p=0.29) did not show statistically significant differences between R and NR groups. Conclusions: Data suggest that early tumor marker decreases in R of RENCA MB are likely not due to the induced SIR, but rather a possibly direct anti-tumor-cell effect by factors released by MB. This supports the importance of the MB-induced changes in the MEF-2 pathway in the target colorectal cancer cell/tumor reported previously. Studies of clinical efficacy of MB continue in a Phase IIb clinical trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01053013

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Translational Research

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01053013

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 4S; abstr 572)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.572

Abstract #

572

Poster Bd #

D21

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mathias Holsey Gramkow

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Clinical characteristics and survival analysis in patients with isolated pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

First Author: Javier Soto Alsar

Abstract

2015 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) as an inflammatory biomarker in patients with hepatobiliary cancers.

First Author: Sidra Anwar