Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Tae Won Kim , Anneli Elme , Zvonko Kusic , Joon Oh Park , Anghel Adrian Udrea , Sun Young Kim , Joong Bae Ahn , Ricardo Villalobos Valencia , Krishnan Srinivasan , Ante Bilic , Nebojsa Manojlovic , Jun Dong , Xuesong Guan , Catherine Lofton-Day , A. Scott Jung , Eduard Vrdoljak
Background: An overall survival (OS) benefit in WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC was not seen with pmab monotherapy in study 20020408 possibly due to crossover of patients (pts) in the BSC arm. Retrospective analyses have indicated that other KRAS and NRAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 are predictive of anti-EGFR tx effects. Study 20100007 assesses the OS benefit of pmab in chemorefractory WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC and is the first phase 3 trial to prospectively evaluate pmab tx effects in WT RAS (exons 2, 3, and 4 of KRAS and NRAS) mCRC. Methods: Anti-EGFR naive pts were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab (6 mg/kg Q2W) + BSC or BSC. KRAS exon 2 and RAS mutation status of tumors were determined centrally. The primary endpoint was OS in WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC. Secondary endpoints were OS in WT RAS mCRC and progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety in both WT KRAS exon 2 and WT RAS groups. Crossover was not permitted. Results: 377 pts with WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC were enrolled. RAS ascertainment rate was 86%. OS was significantly improved with pmab + BSC vs BSC in both WT KRAS exon 2 (HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.57-0.93, P=0.0096) and WT RAS (HR=0.70, 95% CI=0.53-0.93, P=0.0135) mCRC (results in table). Pts with mutant RAS mCRC did not benefit from pmab tx (OS HR=0.99, 95% CI=0.49-2.00). No new safety signals were seen. Conclusions: Pmabsignificantly improved OS in chemorefractory WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC. The tx effects in OS and PFS were more pronounced in those with WT RAS mCRC, further substantiating the importance of RAS testing at diagnosis to best inform the use of pmab to treat mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT01412957
Pmab + BSC | BSC | HR or OR (95% CI) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WT KRAS exon 2, n | 189 | 188 | ||
Median OS - mos (95% CI) | 10.0 (8.7-11.4) | 7.4 (5.8-9.3) | 0.73 (0.57-0.93) | 0.0096 |
Median PFS - mos (95% CI) | 3.6 (3.4-5.3) | 1.7 (1.6-1.9) | 0.51 (0.41-0.64) | <0.0001 |
ORR – % (95% CI) | 27.0 (20.8-33.9) | 1.6 (0.3-4.6) | 24.9 (7.5-123.8) | <0.0001 |
WT RAS, n | 142 | 128 | ||
Median OS - mos (95% CI) | 10.0 (8.7-11.6) | 6.9 (5.2-7.9) | 0.70 (0.53-0.93) | 0.0135 |
Median PFS - mos (95% CI) | 5.2 (3.5-5.3) | 1.7 (1.6-2.2) | 0.46 (0.35-0.59) | <0.0001 |
ORR – % (95% CI) | 31.0 (23.5-39.3) | 2.3 (0.5-6.7) | 20.0 (5.9-101.6) | <0.0001 |
HR=hazard ratio; OR=odds ratio.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tae Won Kim
2013 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Scott D. Patterson
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tae Won Kim
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Michael Sangmin Lee