Efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer: Retrospective study.

Authors

null

Takahiro Miyamoto

Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Takahiro Miyamoto , Takayuki Kii , Masahiro Gotoh , Ken Asaishi , Tetsuji Terazawa , Fukutaro Shimamoto , Shin Kuwakado , Hitoshi Nishitani , Masaru Kawai , Kazuhide Higuchi

Organizations

Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Osaka, Japan, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin infusion (FP) is standard therapy for stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer from results of JCOG9907 and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) of FP is one of the curative options for resectable esophageal cancer with organ preservation results of JCOG9906 in Japan. However, the efficacy and feasibility of NAC FP and CRT for elderly patients (pts) are unclear. Methods: We examined stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer pts aged 70 or over, who received NAC FP or dCRT at our institution between April 2008 and August 2015, retrospectively. Results: 16 pts received NAC FP at least 1 course, while 5 pts received dCRT because of intolerability for surgery, reject of surgery, and patient's wish. Median age was 73/75 (NAC FP/dCRT) and pts in NAC FP had more advanced stage cancer compared with pts in dCRT (p = 0.02). With respect to the toxicity, bone marrow depression developed in dCRT with more high frequency compared with NAC FP, but no pts had febrile neutropenia. Adverse effects of fatigue, nausea and appetite loss developed in both group frequently. 3 pts were not performed surgery because of decreased respiratory function, decreased PS and progression disease and 4 pts did not achieved 4 cycle of FP infusion because of leukopenia, decreased renal function, and gastrointestinal toxicity. 12 pts in NAC FP undergone R0 resection surgery and 4 pts had a complete remission. The 5-year progression free survival rate was 50% (95% CI: 12-86%) in dCRT and 50% (95% CI: 20-80%) in NAC FP (p = 0.69). The 5-year overall survival rate was 50% (95% CI: 12-86%) in dCRT and 67% (95% CI: 36-88%) in NAC FP (p = 0.83). Conclusions: NAC FP and dCRT for stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer might be effective even in pts ≥ 70 years of age. The therapy of dCRT might be one of options for elderly inoperative patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 4S; abstr 135)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.135

Abstract #

135

Poster Bd #

M5

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Go Ikeda

First Author: Go Ikeda

First Author: Charles Gaber