MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients without history of prostate biopsy.

Authors

null

Cayce Nawaf

Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT

Cayce Nawaf , James Rosoff , Jeffrey Weinreb , Amanda Lu , Angelique Levi , Peter Humphrey , Peter Schulam , Preston Sprenkle

Organizations

Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, Yale Department of Urology, New Haven, CT, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, Department of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Results from 12-core template mapping biopsy (Mbx) and concurrent MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy (Tbx) were compared in 118 men without prior biopsy. Methods: Between 12/2012 and 06/2015, 374 men with an indication for prostate biopsy presented to our institution and underwent pre-biopsy mpMRI followed by 12-core standard trans-rectal mapping biopsy (Mbx) and MRI-Ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (Tbx) of lesions identified on mpMRI. The combination of Mbx and Tbx, when both occurred, constitutes a fusion biopsy (Fbx). Men who underwent both Mbx with or without Tbx using the Artemis/Pro-Fuse system with no previous biopsy were included. Patients without a lesion on MRI underwent Mbx only. Maximum Gleason scores (GS) was assigned on a per patient basis with Mbx GS available for all patients in the cohort and Tbx GS available only for patients with a lesion visible on MP-MRI. Clinically significant (CS) was defined as GS ≥3+4. GS per patient was compared by chi-square and McNemar’s test. Results: 118 men met inclusion criteria (mean age=64.9, mean PSA=11.5). Prostate cancer was detected in 64 (54%) Fbx cases. Cancer detection rates for Mbx and Tbx were 54% and 57%, respectively. In patients where Fbx identified CS cancer, Tbx was more likely to have identified the cancer than Mbx (96% vs 72%; p < 0.001). Fewer GS 6 cancers were detected by Tbx (n=7) than by Mbx (n=25), and Tbx alone would have prevented the detection of 21 (18%) cases of GS 6 disease. Conversely, more GS≥ 7 (50% of men) was detected on Tbx than on Mbx (33% of men). In total, there were 16 patients (13.5%) that were missed or understaged by Tbx, but only 4 of these patients (3%) were GS≥ 7. In contrast, there were 19 (16%) patients that were missed or understaged by Mbx, but 17 (14%) of these 19 patients harbored GS≥ 7 disease. Conclusions: In biopsy-naive men who are suspected to have prostate cancer, Tbx provides improved detection of CS prostate cancer compared with Mbx while decreasing the detection of low-grade disease. Tbx alone in biopsy-naive men should be considered if missing 3% of CS disease is acceptable.

Systematic

≥4+33+43+3No cancerTotal
Targeted≥4+32321430
3+41108221
3+301427
No cancer0173543
No target1051117
Total25142554118

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 150)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.150

Abstract #

150

Poster Bd #

C9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial differences in the utilization of MRI-guided biopsy before prostate cancer diagnosis.

First Author: Grace L. Lu-Yao

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir

First Author: Joshua Mabellos