Human antigen R as a predictive marker for response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer.

Authors

null

Yasuyoshi Miyata

Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

Yasuyoshi Miyata , Kensuke Mitsunari , Akihiro Asai , Tomohiro Matsuo , Kojiro Ohba , Hideki Sakai

Organizations

Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan, Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan, Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: In patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC), a combined therapy of cisplatin (CDDP) and gemcitabine (GEM) is the most commonly used first (1st)-line systematic chemotherapy. Although no regimen for CDDP-resistant UC has been established, GEM-based regimens are often used in these patients. In other cancers, HuR status in cancer cells is closely associated with response to GEM. The aim of this study was to establish the predictive value of HuR expression for disease progression and survival in UC patients treated with GEM-based regimens as 1st or second (2nd)-line chemotherapy. Methods: Fifty patients with advanced UC were included in the study. As 1st-line chemotherapy, MVEC (methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and CDDP) and GC therapy were performed in 34 (68.0%) and 16 patients (32.0%), respectively. After progression, 45 patients (90.0%) were treated with combined GEM and paclitaxel (PTX) therapy, and 5 patients (10.0%) were treated with GEM monotherapy. Cytoplasmic and nuclear Human antigen R (HuR) expression was evaluated using immunohistochemical techniques. The relationships between HuR expression and local response and outcome were analyzed. Results: In 1st-line chemotherapy, no anti-cancer effects were associated with nuclear or cytoplasmic HuR expression. In 2nd-line chemotherapy, although nuclear HuR expression also had no significant relationship to anti-cancer effects, local tumor response was significantly better if there was positive cytoplasmic HuR expression (P = 0.002). Multivariate analyses revealed that cytoplasmic HuR expression was a significant predictive marker for longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidential interval, 0.09–0.56; P = 0.001). There is no significant relationship between nuclear HuR expression and parameters of anti-cancer effects. Conclusions: Cytoplasmic HuR expression is a significant predictive marker of response to GEM-based chemotherapy in CDDP-resistant UC. Despite limitations of a small retrospective study, our results might have important information to discuss the treatment strategies and warrant further basic and clinical research.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 421)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.421

Abstract #

421

Poster Bd #

H14

Abstract Disclosures