Prognostic utility of a multi-gene signature (the cell cycle proliferation score) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical nephrectomy.

Authors

null

Todd Matthew Morgan

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Todd Matthew Morgan , Rohit Mehra , J. Stuart Wolf , Placede Gangnang Fosso , Brian Orr , Shulin Wu , Zaina Sangale , Steven Stone , Chin-Lee Wu , Adam S. Feldman

Organizations

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, Department of Urology, Ann Arbor, MI, Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: There are currently no RCC biomarkers being routinely used in the clinic, and prognostic nomograms rely almost entirely on tumor size, stage and age. There is a critical need for improved prognostic discrimination given the increasing awareness that some patients may be managed with active surveillance, while others with higher risk disease might benefit from adjuvant therapy following surgery. We hypothesized that a previously developed multi-gene proliferation signature would predict long-term oncologic outcomes in surgically resected RCC. Methods: The cell cycle proliferation (CCP) score was derived after radical nephrectomy in 305 patients who were treated at a single center from 2000 to 2007 for clear cell, papillary or chromophobe RCC with localized disease (N0M0). Sixty-four percent of the cohort had stage I disease. Outcomes were either disease recurrence (local or metastatic), or disease specific mortality (DSM). Association with outcomes was evaluated by CoxPH survival analysis and likelihood ratio tests. Hazard ratios (HR) are given for one-unit increase in CCP score (equivalent to a doubling of gene expression). Results: Patient data were censored at 5-years of follow-up, by which time 32 patients (10%) recurred and 16 (5%) died of disease. The median CCP score was 0.095 (IQR -0.50 to 0.60). In univariable analysis, CCP score was a significant prognostic variable for both recurrence (p < 10-4) and DSM (p < 10-5). After adjusting for clinical variables including tumor size, stage, and grade, the CCP score HR for recurrence was 1.74 (95% CI (1.14, 2.65)), and for DSM was 2.59 (95% CI (1.43, 4.67)). There was no interaction between CCP and any clinical variable. A prognostic model combining clinical and molecular information will be presented along with external validation in a second cohort (N~400). Conclusions: The CCP score appears to be a significant and independent predictor of key long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who have undergone nephrectomy for RCC, providing prognostic information beyond what is available from clinical parameters. Once validated, the CCP score may have utility in the clinical management of patients with RCC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 555)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.555

Abstract #

555

Poster Bd #

F16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Viktor Grünwald

First Author: Franklin Liu

First Author: Manasawee Tanariyakul

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Renal cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: Is there a role for screening?

First Author: Binoy Yohannan