Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) and prostate cancer recurrence.

Authors

null

Stacy Loeb

New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY

Stacy Loeb , Yasin Folkvaljon , David Robinson , Thorsten Schlomm , Hans Garmo , Pär Stattin

Organizations

New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden, Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, Umea University, Umeå, Sweden

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are commonly used for management of erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer (CaP) treatment. Single-institution studies have reported conflicting data on PDE5i use and recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). We re-evaluated the association between PDE5i use after RP and RT with biochemical recurrence in a nationwide, population-based registry. Methods: We performed a nested case-control study using data from the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden (including >98% prostate cancer cases nationwide), linked to the national Prescribed Drug Register. Among men with localized CaP who underwent primary RT or RP from 2006-2007 with 5 years of follow-up, we identified those with biochemical recurrence (n=293 cases). For each case, we identified 20 controls who were recurrence-free at the event date of the index case, using incidence density sampling stratified by age and treatment (n=5,767 controls). Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between overall PDE5i use and cumulative pill number with biochemical recurrence. Results: Among men treated by RT, PDE5i were not associated with BCR (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.48-1.94), adjusting for marital status, education, income, PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score, and proportion of positive biopsies. As shown in the table, PDE5i were not associated with biochemical recurrence after RP adjusting for clinical features (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.05), or with additional adjustment for surgical pathology (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.62-1.10). Men whose cumulative number of PDE5i pills was above the median had a slightly lower risk of biochemical recurrence in the clinical model, and no difference in risk of biochemical recurrence after adjustment for RP features. Conclusions: Our results from a population-based setting suggest against an increased risk of biochemical recurrence among men using PDE5i after CaP treatment.

Clinical modelFinal model
with pathology
Any PDE5i use (yes vs. no)OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.05OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.98
Cumulative pills (above vs.
below median)
OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.62-1.10OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51-1.02

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 55)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.55

Abstract #

55

Poster Bd #

C15

Abstract Disclosures